AI Rate Professor

Communication Studies

Jasmine Williams

COMM325 · COMM301 · 30 lifetime ratings

AI rating
56/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
61.29%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you will attend and practice; unless you must.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyParticipation heavyGroup projects and speechesLate grading issuesGreat for public speakingWeak online communication
  • In-person COMM301 often builds confidence with and a supportive room
  • Online sections draw sharp criticism for , and ungraded work
  • Chronic late grading and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Many students earn As by showing up, following rubrics, and completing speeches, though .

; online still reports As but with more stress and self-teaching.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content is not conceptually hard; stress comes from speeches, groups, and .

Both formats describe light intellectual load; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Attendance and participation are repeatedly required and can tank grades if you miss class.

In-person is clearly mandatory; and group meetups.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Roughly six in and strong online avoiders.

; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

, but tough participation hits and late unexplained grades frustrate students.

Format shift

In-person mixed fair versus tough; online complains grades sit ungraded for weeks.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Workload centers on speeches, group work, and .

Format shift

Online COMM325 can .

Teaching experience

Average

54/100

Students split between entertaining confidence-building instruction and unprofessional communication.

Format shift

; online teaching and communication are heavily criticized.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grade mostly comes from speeches, group projects, participation, and a .

Format shift

Both formats are assignment and speech driven more than traditional exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students often praise fun activities and speech confidence, while a vocal minority cites unprofessionalism and late grades.

Main concern

, and delayed grade entry.

What students said

“I was afraid of public speaking before this class, but after I can confidently say I am not.”
COMM301
“If you're even somewhat decent at public speaking, you'll likely earn an A.”
COMM301
“ .”
COMM301

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed , and very late grading.

Main concern

Poor communication and ungraded work make online sections stressful.

What students said

“BEWARE OF PROFESSOR WILLIAMS ONLINE CLASSES!! This class did nothing but stress me out because the .”
COMM325
“I taught myself!”
COMM325
“ if you absolutely don't have to.”
COMM301

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is speech- and proctored finals.

SpeechesGroup presentationsShort essay midtermParticipation grading

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; main stakes are scheduled speeches and participation.

Multiple major speechesShort essay midtermClear rubrics for some sections
“ . Speeches are easy but does require some background work”
COMM325
“Everything is graded super clearly so just follow the rubrics.”
COMM301

Online

, and projects with little clarity on proctoring.

Group projectsSpeechesJournalsSlow grading
“Did 2 Speeches Together(Midterm & Final), 7 Group assignments”
COMM325
“She never grades anything and her last 3 assignments of the class were never graded.”
COMM325

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I was afraid of public speaking before this class, but after I can confidently say I am not.”

Voice snapshots generated from 31 reviews, balancing strong in-person speech praise with online and . Credibility rating: High.

🎤 Speech Confidence

78/100

“I felt more comfortable and confident speaking publicly after this course.”

⚠️

35/100

“ . Class was good overall.”

💻 Online Warning

20/100

“ . Her class feels like she had a week to prepare the material.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures are entertaining and straightforward
  • fun class activities to ease you into everything
  • Ironically bad at communicating and explaining assignments

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • If you're even somewhat decent at public speaking, you'll likely earn an A
  • This class didn't feel very stressful at all as far as the workload
  • and not a great communicator

Theme 3

👥 About Groups and Attendance

  • Participation and
  • group projects and group
  • 10/10 The whole class was nothing but good vibes

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

31

Recent reviews read by the AI

30

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

31 recent reviews with and repeated themes on speeches, groups, and .

Inside 31 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 57

Course coverage

COMM30123 reviews
COMM3258 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

31 reported outcomes

A range

18

A+ 4 · A 13 · A- 1

B range

7

B+ 5 · B 2

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 3