Is this an easy A?
FairEffort
54/100As are common for prepared students, but he is frequently a and .
In-person reviews dominate; online sample is too small to show a different A path.
ENGR405 · ENGR412 · ENGR400 · ENGR300 · ENGR401 · EBGR422 · 28 lifetime ratings
The decision
Key questions
Is this an easy A?
As are common for prepared students, but he is frequently a x x and x x x x x x x.
In-person reviews dominate; online sample is too small to show a different A path.
Is the course easy?
Lectures make material clearer than average, yet circuits, materials, and programming courses remain legitimately demanding engineering work.
ENGR 300 feels easier online and in person; ENGR 405 and some 412 reviews describe high difficulty.
Is attendance flexible?
x x x x x x x because lectures and labs drive success, though some sections list it as optional.
x x x x x x; online notes are sparse.
Is this professor recommended?
About 80% would take him again and many call him a favorite, tempered by sharp recent warnings on ENGR 405.
x x x x x; the two online reviews are positive on teaching with x x x.
Course guide
Grading
Fair
50/100
He is often labeled a tough or x x, but students also call grading fair with small bonuses for x x.
Format shift
x x x x x; online comments focus more on care than leniency.
Workload
Moderate
44/100
Homework and x x x x, but x x x x and exam preparation requires steady practice.
Format shift
One online ENGR 400 review reports extreme homework; x x x x x x.
Teaching experience
Excellent
88/100
Students repeatedly highlight clear engaging lectures, real care, career mentoring, and accessible office hours.
Format shift
x x x x x x; online reviews agree on care and clarity despite tiny sample.
Assessment method
FocusOnExams
78/100
Multiple midterms, quizzes, formal labs, and x x x x x x; homework is often practice or a small bonus.
Format shift
In-person and online both describe exam-centered structures with supporting labs and homework.
Luni fit check
Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.
Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.
Course format
Classroom format
High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward
In-person students overwhelmingly praise engaging lectures, name recognition, office hours, and fairness, with a recent cluster of harsh ENGR 405 drop-related complaints about difficulty and support.
Main concern
Upper-division or programming-heavy sections can feel unforgiving for beginners and x x x.
What students said
“Professor Wyles is the gold standard of engineering professors at Los Rios.”
“Professor Wyles is a cool guy, but his ENGR 405 class is NOT (!) beginner friendly.”
“x x if you can!!!”
Remote format
Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward
x x x x x x x x x and clarity, with one circuits student warning about a nightmarish homework load.
Main concern
x x x x x x x x exceed the unit count.
What students said
“One of the x x x x. Takes time to cover material in depth.”
“He is the nicest professor and will go out of his way to help you succeed.”
Exam style
Exams are challenging but usually fair and aligned with homework practice; x x x x x x x x.
Assessment risk
Standard
48/100
Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.
x x x x x x x x, quizzes, and formal lab reports with straightforward but study-heavy tests.
“x x x x x x x x problems and you should be fine.”
“The x x x so you need to study for it.”
“x x x x x x.”
Online comments emphasize heavy homework that prepares for x x x x x x.
“If you really try on the x x x x.”
Student evidence
Top student voice
“Professor Wyles is the gold standard of engineering professors at Los Rios.”
“He is probably overall the x x x x x x x x subject.”
“Weight was 95% exams and 5% professionalism”
“Wyles genuinely cares for your success and future as a student”
“his ENGR 405 class is NOT (!) beginner friendly.”
Theme 1
Theme 2
Theme 3
Data context
Analysis sample
30
Recent reviews read by the AI
28
Lifetime ratings
86/100
Evidence confidence
Thirty detailed reviews across multiple engineering courses, strong internal consistency on teaching quality, and transparent recent ENGR 405 criticism support high credibility.
Inside 30 stored ratings
Reported outcomes
28 reported outcomes
A+ 2 · A 13
B+ 1 · B 3
C+ 1 · C 2
D+ 1
No reported values
Drop/Withdrawal 4 · Not sure yet 1