AI Rate Professor

English

Nancy Olsen

ENGWR302 · ENG110 · ENGRD11 · ENGWR300 · ENGWR301 · ENGRD310 · ENRD11 · ENGRD10 · ENG310 · ENGRD110 · ENGLT345 · 100 lifetime ratings

AI rating
90/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
84.09%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you can keep up with weekly annotations and will finish the work.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring and encouragingLots of extra creditReading and annotations heavyEasy grader for gen edsClear weekly structure
  • Most , and .
  • , and papers rather than high-stakes exams.
  • Online gen-eds feel like easy As; and more school-like.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Most students say finishing work and using yields an A, though some writing sections grade more strictly.

Online gen-eds sound easier for As; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

, but and page-by-page annotations add real time demand.

Online courses feel lighter and more routine; and class participation.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

in-person participation with random calling.

Online is usually flexible; .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

, and student success support.

Recommendation is especially strong online; mixed outliers.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

Many call her an easy grader with and revision chances, while a minority say she is tough or inconsistent.

Format shift

Online reviews lean generous; .

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Weekly discussions, annotations, and if you stay current.

Format shift

Online weekly modules are predictable; and reading loads.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students , and invested in student success.

Format shift

Both formats praise her care; online students especially like weekly videos and structure.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grades are driven by weekly annotations, discussions, and essays, with many students saying there are few or no traditional finals.

Format shift

Online and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and caring, but many note heavy reading, mandatory annotations, participation calls, and occasional tough or .

Main concern

Heavy annotation load and mixed fairness complaints can frustrate students who want a hands-off writing class.

What students said

“Easiest English . No test, and only 1 big paper.”
ENGWR300
“Very caring. Only problem is she gives a lot of homework and can be a .”
Engwr301
“She treats the class like it's middle school... She seems to grade differently for each student.”
Engwr301

Remote format

Online

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online students praise clear weekly modules, personal update videos, late flexibility, , and and writing.

Main concern

A minority report heavy high-stakes essays or and AI guidance.

What students said

“It's an easy A if you do the work.”
ENGLT345
“Graded very easily... Take her 100%”
ENGLT-345
“this is the first time in my life I've gotten an A in an English class.”
ENGRD310

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and writing, with multiple courses reporting .

Few or no finalsAssignment-based assessmentExtra creditAnnotations and papers

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person work centers on reading, annotations, papers, and participation; several students .

Annotation heavyParticipation mattersNo finals in some sections
“ .”
ENGWR300
“No test, and only 1 big paper (but she guides you through it step by step).”
ENGWR300

Online

Online students describe routine modules, discussions, papers, and .

Weekly modulesDiscussion boardsNo mid-term or final reported
“No mid-term or final.”
ENGRD10
“ , and about 7 writing essay assignments throughout the semester. No exams.”
ENGWR300

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“One of the but I feel like I still learned a lot.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting care, , and annotation-heavy English work. Credibility rating: High.

❤️ Caring Support

88/100

“Genuinely wants you to succeed. 10/10”

🎯 Easy A Potential

82/100

“It's an easy A if you do the work.”

📚 Annotation Workload

52/100

“Lots of annotating. Grades nicely but you just have to finish everything.”

👍

86/100

“TAKE HER 100%!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's a great professor! The and consistent
  • She makes wonderful little videos for her students
  • Amazing professor. Sweetest lady ever.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • There's always xtra credit
  • Probably is one of the easiest english classes I have ever taken
  • can be a and

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • One of the
  • super caring and thoughtful of all students
  • I LOVE HER. She really wants her students to succeed.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

100

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

50 detailed reviews across many years and both formats show consistent themes of care, , and annotation-heavy English work.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 580
4 out of 512
3 out of 54
2 out of 53
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGWR30014 reviews
ENGRD117 reviews
ENGRD3106 reviews
Engwr3016 reviews
ENG3104 reviews
Show 7 more courses
ENGLT-3453 reviews
ENGLT3453 reviews
ENGWR3023 reviews
ENG1101 review
ENGRD101 review
ENGRD1101 review
ENRD111 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

44 reported outcomes

A range

30

A+ 14 · A 12 · A- 4

B range

10

B+ 2 · B 7 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1