AI Rate Professor

English

Julie Colombo

WLD57 · SCC157E · WLD57P · INDIS313 · ENGWR300 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Avoid unless you thrive on high writing volume and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHomework avalancheUnclear essay directionsSlow or missing feedbackKind but chaoticLate work accepted
  • Heavy weekly writing load with vague instructions is the dominant complaint.
  • Kind personality and late-work .
  • Recommendation rate is low; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some students still earn As, but only after heavy weekly writing and .

Online and ; grades vary from A to C or drop.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

, and process writing make the content load high for composition.

and writing volume; in-person adds group work and check-ins.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

and warn that skipping hurts, despite soft due-date culture.

; in-person is consistently mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

; praise for kindness is outweighed by workload and .

One strong online defender exists, but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Tagged tough grader often; process writing and improve.

Format shift

Online split between tough and understanding; .

Workload

Overwhelming

16/100

Four to , and a semester research paper dominate student time.

Format shift

Both formats hammer lots of homework; online catch-up is especially brutal.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Kindness and accessibility are real, but and .

Format shift

Recent in-person reviews remain mixed; older in-person reviews are harshest.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and a long research paper replace a traditional final exam.

Format shift

Online and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students split between sweet extra-credit mentors and and ungraded work.

Main concern

Lots of and .

What students said

“I spent 20+ hours a week on this class, yet my work was rarely graded”
ENGWR300
“she never grades them in time.”
WLD57
“The professor gives out like candy and all hw are due at the end of the semester.”
ENGWR300

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online ENGWR300 is homework-heavy; one student thrived with constant contact, another could not keep up despite late-work acceptance.

Main concern

very hard.

What students said

“Be ready for a load of assignments. She does accept late work but its hard to catch up”
ENGWR300
“I was intimidated by all the reading and writing I had to do. It was a challenge, but she is so understanding”
ENGWR300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

High-stakes assessment is mainly progressive research writing and frequent short responses, not proctored exams.

Semester research paperReading responsesProcess writing gradedNo classic final sometimesHeavy homework percent

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

sections; midterms and short writings are graded strictly with process work counted.

Research paper finalProcess writing gradedMidterms possibleReading responses
“the in sections so it makes it easier on you.”
ENGWR300
“Also, she grades process writing for !?”
WLD57

Online

Online evidence focuses on dense assignment streams rather than webcam or lockdown exams; .

Heavy assignment streamLate work acceptedWriting focused
“Be ready for a load of assignments. She does accept late work but its hard to catch up in this class if you fell behind”
ENGWR300

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I spent 20+ hours a week on this class, yet my work was rarely graded, leaving me unsure if I was meeting expectations.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews (2 online, 11 in , and mixed kindness. Credibility rating: Medium.

📚

16/100

“Be prepared to complete at least 4-5 written assignments per week.”

📝

32/100

“ and gives unclear directions.”

❤️ Kind Intent

55/100

“she is so understanding and will work with you with anything if you stay in contact”

🚫 Recommendation Risk

34/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , but her class policy is strange.
  • Professor Colombo really does mean well.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I spent 20+ hours a week on this class, yet my work was rarely graded
  • Homework counts 15% of the grade and almost no one gets a C for .
  • The professor gives out like candy

Theme 3

⚠️ About Workload Pain

  • Lots of
  • .
  • It was hard to keep up with all of the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews with recurring workload and , but sample size is modest and quality ratings are polarized.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 56
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENGWR3007 reviews
WLD573 reviews
INDIS3131 review
SCC157E1 review
WLD57P1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 4

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather not say 2