AI Rate Professor

Administration Of Justice

Richard Harris

ADJ300 · ADMJ300 · AJ301 · ADMJ301 · ADJ301 · 86 lifetime ratings

AI rating
97/100
RMP rating
4.9/5
Take again
98.61%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

, and highly practical.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGives good feedbackClear grading criteriaCaringAccessible outside classReal-world experience
  • Extremely high quality ratings and near-100% take-again for Admin of Justice courses.
  • , and real law-enforcement experience.
  • Writing and , but workload stays manageable if you stay on track.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

Most students earn A or and doing weekly work on time; format slips cost a .

Both formats call the work doable; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Material is accessible intro criminal-justice content with interesting topics rather than abstract theory.

Online and in person both describe informative but not overly hard content.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

Reviews split between mandatory attendance and .

Online often allows flexible attendance; .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

97/100

Nearly all students would take him again and many call him the .

Recommendation is overwhelmingly strong in both online and in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

70/100

Clear rubrics and , though .

Format shift

Online writers note tougher punctuation/format scoring; in .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Weekly discussions, quizzes, and papers are common but repeatedly described as manageable.

Format shift

Both formats report weekly writing; few call it overwhelming.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

, and genuine care for success.

Format shift

Praise for feedback and accessibility is consistent across online and in person.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

, and report-writing exercises more than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

Online emphasizes papers and discussions; in person emphasizes report writing and projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students praise kindness, clear criteria, report-writing skill building, and practical law-enforcement insight.

Main concern

Some sections have weekly reports or a .

What students said

“This was by far the easiest class i had this semester, learned a lot and passed with an easy A.”
ADJ300
“He is a great report writing teacher.”
ADMJ301

Remote format

Online

34 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Well-organized online ADJ/ADMJ courses with , and real-world stories; writing format is graded carefully.

Main concern

Weekly papers and .

What students said

“ so far”
ADMJ300
“ and explains the topic thoroughly.”
ADMJ301

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly weekly writing and finals.

Weekly quizzesDiscussion boardsWeekly papers/reportsClear rubricsTextbook/Pearson quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person report writing uses samples and rubrics; some sections include reading quizzes and a .

Weekly reportsSamples providedReading for testsFinal project
“We have reports to do every week and he gives us samples on what they should look like.”
AJ301
“there is a .”
ADJ300

Online

Online work is weekly papers, discussions, and ; no webcam or Lockdown Browser is clearly described.

Weekly papersDiscussion boardsTextbook quizzesClear orientation guidelines
“I knew what was expected each week, and as long as you stay on track you should be good.”
ADMJ300
“Easy A take the class!”
ADMJ300

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Harris is, by far, the in Sacramento.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 , and strong recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“Extremely helpful and an amazing professor.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

97/100

“the GOAT”

📝

90/100

“His class is clearly outlined for what is required for good grades.”

❤️ Student Support

94/100

“The taking a class for.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He tells stories of his past personal experiences
  • clear and direct instruction on how to complete the work
  • gives you very clear criteria on what your reports should look like

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • not difficult yet still learned a lot!
  • passed with an easy A
  • as long as you do your work, you will pass this class!

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • genuinely cares about his students
  • works with you so you dont fall behind or fail

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

86

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

50 highly consistent, detailed reviews across online and scores.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 581
4 out of 55
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ADMJ30018 reviews
ADMJ30112 reviews
ADJ30010 reviews
ADJ3019 reviews
AJ3011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

46 reported outcomes

A range

34

A+ 6 · A 25 · A- 3

B range

9

B+ 3 · B 5 · B- 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1