AI Rate Professor

English

Laura Newey

ENG300 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Only take her if and and possible AI scrutiny.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderPolarizing FeedbackAI AccusationsGrammar SticklerHigh Workload
  • Reviews are sharply split between excellent writing coaching and hostile unsupported experiences.
  • She is repeatedly tagged a and strict standards.
  • Tiny sample size makes outcomes unpredictable, especially around AI suspicion and response speed.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Even A and substantial work; success requires following instructions carefully under strict standards.

All formats paint her as a ; online has no positive grade-path detail.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

High difficulty ratings and comments about heavy writing standards and lots of .

; the online review rates difficulty at the top.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Attendance flags differ across reviews and .

; others say yes, with thin overall detail.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Two enthusiastic take-again reviews are canceled out by two quality-1 experiences and a 50 percent take-again rate.

In-person opinions split hard; the only online review is strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

, and students report harsh AI accusations and high standards for grammar and originality.

Format shift

Both formats label her a ; .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Comments and writing expectations, and substantial revision pressure.

Format shift

Online and in-person both mention heavy work; sample is small.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Half the reviews praise excellent lectures and ; , and AI-only focus.

Format shift

In-person is polarized; the lone online review is entirely negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and homework rather than exam-heavy assessment.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and fair success with work, one says she only accuses students of AI.

Main concern

Tough grading and AI accusations .

What students said

“Easily given the best and and lectures for improving my writing.”
ENG300
“All this professor does is accuse you of using AI”
ENG300
“If you do the work and follow instructions there's no reason why you wouldn't get a good grade.”
ENG300

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single online review is harshly negative, , and zero flexibility.

Main concern

Students may get no usable help before deadlines and feel ignored.

What students said

“ . She never listened to my concerns. On top of that, she always replied late—usually after the deadline had already passed”
ENG300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on writing work and ; they do not clearly prove a .

Writing AssignmentsStrict FeedbackTough Grading

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments emphasize writing feedback and .

Writing FeedbackTough Grading
“Easily given the best and and lectures for improving my writing.”
ENG300
“She is a stickler for proper grammar.”
ENG300

Online

The only online ; and lack of support.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easily given the best and and lectures for improving my writing. Not the easiest class, but so long as you put in a halfway-decent amount of work, you will succeed”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews (1 online, 3 in and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“Easily given the best and and lectures for improving my writing.”

⚠️ Negative Experience

15/100

“ . She never listened to my concerns.”

⚖️

24/100

“All this professor does is accuse you of using AI”

📝 Work Expectations

28/100

“If you do the work and follow instructions there's no reason why you wouldn't get a good grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • patient instructor
  • best and and lectures

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of homework
  • Not the easiest class

Theme 3

⚠️ About Support Issues

  • All this professor does is accuse you of using AI
  • she always replied late—usually after the deadline had already passed
  • It felt like she didn't care about teaching or her students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

32/100

Evidence confidence

Only 4 reviews with extreme polarization and limited detail lower confidence despite some vivid comments.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG3004 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values