AI Rate Professor

English

Iqbal Mahmood

WLD57 · ENGWR302 · ENG302 · WLD57S · ENGWR303 · EGWR302 · ENGWR300 · 39 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
6.67%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Avoid if you want a fair GPA boost; if you are a strong writer ready for .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderMonotone lecturesHeavy papersHarsh grammar focusAvoid if possible
  • Recent and unclear standards.
  • and no late work.
  • Older reviews are mixed, but and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Many students say As are nearly impossible and Cs are common even with strong .

Online recent reviews are especially impossible-feeling; As, creating a split.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

, and tough standards make the content and pace demanding for most.

Online accelerated sections feel especially overloaded; in person is still tough for many.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Comments repeatedly mark lectures mandatory with strict lateness and .

Both formats report mandatory attendance; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

Would-take-again is about 7% and recent comments urge students to pick anyone else.

; in-person older positives do not outweigh the modern warning.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

and C-ceiling complaints dominate; he is picky on grammar and rarely rewards effort.

Format shift

Online is extremely harsh with zeros and AI claims; in person is long known as hard to break a C.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Frequent long responses, research essays, and .

Format shift

Online recent sections are especially paper-flooded; in person also has many essays and weekly writing.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

, and unhelpful despite occasional nice-guy or older positive notes.

Format shift

; in-person older reviews are split between boring and excellent.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

and written finals more than balanced exams and projects.

Format shift

Online is almost all written responses and essays; in person is essay-centered with some in-class writing.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

35 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

many call him a , while older reviews sometimes praise ease.

Main concern

and unhelpful feedback.

What students said

“he is one of the HARDEST graders out there.”
WLD57
“Ruuuun from this professor!”
ENGWR300
“extremely challenging but fair.”
ENGWR303

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Recent online ENGWR302 is slammed for , and AI accusations.

Main concern

, and inconsistent requirements.

What students said

“AVOID IF POSSIBLE! Unnecessarily and Extremely Harsh Grader!”
ENGWR302
“Gives so much assignments.”
ENGWR302
“Gave me a zero trying to say I used AI.”
EGWR302

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is strict paper-based grading with long timed written responses and little flexibility.

Long written finalsHarsh essay gradingNo late workMLA focus

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person emphasizes essays and grammar-heavy grading; .

Grammar-focused essay gradingIn-class writingsMandatory lectures
“It is very hard to score anything higher than a C+ in his class.”
WLD57
“He is a .”
ENGWR300

Online

Online uses frequent long essays and standards.

1000+ word responsesTwo final written examsNo late assignmentsAI plagiarism accusations
“Gives 2 Final Exam each requiring a 1,000 word written response.”
ENGWR302
“ !”
ENGWR302

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“AVOID IF POSSIBLE! Unnecessarily and Extremely Harsh Grader!”

Voice snapshots generated from 39 and low recommendation. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“Pretty terrible professor. Extremely unhelpful.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

15/100

“ !”

⚖️

18/100

“he is one of the HARDEST graders out there.”

📚 Heavy Workload

22/100

“Gives so much assignments.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Boring, monotonous lectures.
  • He has a thick accent and talks very monotone
  • lectures can be monotone and expect .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Impossible to get an A in his class.
  • It is really hard to get above a C.
  • !

Theme 3

⚠️ About Clarity & Fairness

  • This teacher .
  • Gave me a zero trying to say I used AI.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

39

Recent reviews read by the AI

39

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

39 reviews with a , but older positive reviews reduce perfect consistency.

Inside 39 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 54
3 out of 55
2 out of 54
1 out of 514

Course coverage

ENGWR30015 reviews
WLD5711 reviews
ENGWR3026 reviews
EGWR3023 reviews
WLD57S2 reviews
Show 2 more courses
ENG3021 review
ENGWR3031 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

3

B 3

C range

2

C 2

D range

2

D 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1