AI Rate Professor

Psychology

KIMBERLY SMITH

PSYCH · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.8

The decision

; every review describes unfair zeros and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderUnclear instructionsZeros assignmentsCanvas confusionAvoid completely
  • All five reviews rate quality 1/5 with .
  • Students say instructions are vague then assignments are zeroed for not matching hidden criteria.
  • Grades and no resubmissions.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

Students report zeros, half credit, C/D outcomes, and ; no one reports an easy A path.

All online and the .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

Difficulty is high mainly from unclear expectations and .

Online reviews drive this; .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

70/100

Most reviews mark attendance not mandatory; the .

; one online review marked mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

0% would take again and every .

and in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

8/100

Repeated zeros, incomplete marks, and half credit for .

Format shift

Harsh zeros dominate online; the sole in-person review matches.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Work is assignment-based papers and movie responses, but the .

Format shift

Online mentions movie papers and ; limited detail overall.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Students , and feedback feels punitive or mocking.

Format shift

Online reviews are detailed and awful; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment centers on written assignments and movie responses rather than exams.

Format shift

Online evidence is assignment-centric; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Single in-person review also reports zeroed incomplete work for not matching preferred answers despite little instruction.

Main concern

.

What students said

“She graded most of not answer the prompt just as she would like it, although she gave little to no instructions.”
psych

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online psych is described as , and mocking announcements.

Main concern

and no resubmits.

What students said

“Gives vague and misleading instructions, then zeros assignments for following her instructions.”
psych
“gave me a assignment right.”
psych
“Happy to give 0's due to her lack of clarity.”
psych

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

No clear exam policy appears; written assignments.

Assignment zerosVague rubricsNo resubmissions

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Only evidence is zero or incomplete assignment grades for not matching preferred prompt answers.

Zeroed assignmentsLittle instruction
“She graded most of ”
psych

Online

Reviews do not describe formal exams; risk is zeros on written movie and Canvas assignments with no resubmit.

Written movie analysisCanvas assignment zerosNo resubmissions
“Often more than half of the class will get a zero on an assignment”
psych
“tell us no resubmissions”
psych

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do yourself the favor of choosing a different professor”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 and fairness. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“Horrible Professor 0/5. and vague in directions.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

5/100

“ .”

⚖️

8/100

“gave me a ”

📋

12/100

“Gives vague and misleading instructions, then zeros assignments for following her instructions.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • Only professor .
  • if you are looking to learn from an actual human

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • graded most of
  • she would still give me half credit
  • Happy to give 0's due to her lack of clarity.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Fairness

  • she will send a message to all students telling us we did the assignment wrong
  • She sent an announcement out laughing at students who did not understand
  • no resubmissions

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

40/100

Evidence confidence

Only 5 recent reviews, all extremely negative and detailed, but small sample and short time span limit confidence.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

psych5 reviews

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C 2

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 1