AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Fungai Mukome

CHEM400 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
29/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid if and ; self-starters may still pass.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedLate gradingVague answersLab-focusedTrick quizzes
  • Students mainly describe CHEM400 lab/lecture as .
  • Helpfulness and friendliness appear, but explanations and .
  • ; one positive review calls him a good lab professor.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Reported grades include A and B, but and .

All evidence is in-person.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Chem400 content plus unclear quizzes and weak lab instruction make the course moderately hard.

All evidence is in-person.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Most reviews mark attendance mandatory for .

All evidence is in-person.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

and several students explicitly .

All evidence is in-person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Grades are not uniformly harsh, but inconsistency and late entry undermine fairness.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Lab reports, prelab quizzes, and but not always crushing load.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Niceness is noted, yet unprepared labs, slide reading, and .

Format shift

All evidence is in-person.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

40/100

Lab reports, prelab quizzes, and .

Format shift

All evidence is in-person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

All feedback is in-person CHEM400, emphasizing disorganization, late grading, and .

Main concern

, and .

What students said

“Extremely unprepared; ; makes you use a workbook made by SCC Chem faculty which has a lot of typos”
CHEM400
“ and unfair.”
CHEM400
“Good lab professor.”
CHEM400

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments center on lab quizzes and reports; one student called exams hard but fair.

Prelab quizzesLab reportsHard but fair exams (one review)

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person CHEM400 uses prelab quizzes, lab reports, and standard course exams with fairness complaints on quizzes.

Misleading prelab quizzesLate-entered lab gradesExams hard but fair
“ and unfair.”
CHEM400
“ , but fair! I passed the class with a B.”
CHEM400

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“if ”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person CHEM400 reviews with low sample size; credibility Low.

🧭 Organization Gaps

25/100

“One of the . HW was in the wrong place every week.”

🧪

30/100

“little to no instruction or .”

🙂 Kind But Limited

55/100

“he was really nice but the and .”

👍

70/100

“Gives a quick summary of what will be done during the lab and is always happy to help.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching

  • returns your answer with a
  • lectures were just the
  • always happy to help

Theme 2

📈

  • Inconsistent with grading
  • many trick and semantic questions for prelab quiz
  • Basically all of the grades were input right before the end of finals week

Theme 3

📚 About Course Setup

  • workbook ... has a lot of typos and ambiguous questions
  • HW was in the wrong place every week
  • Lectures didn't match the week of HW either

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only five recent in-person reviews; themes align but sample is small and .

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CHEM4005 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values