AI Rate Professor

History

Hazel Leong

Courses not reported · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
64.29%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Worth it if , and use ; avoid if heavy weekly papers stress you out.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPaper Heavy Online HistoryExtra Credit LifelineAI Zero ToleranceFirm but Fair FeedbackWorkload Front-Loaded
  • Many students earn A/A+ , and abundant .
  • Workload is paper-heavy and front-loaded; some weeks feel unmanageable with other classes.
  • Strong backlash when AI-detection flags trigger threats to report students to administration.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

72/100

High A/A+ rates, retakeable tests, and heavy make strong grades realistic if you keep up with papers.

Mostly online evidence; the +.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is manageable history work, but weekly 3-6 page analyses raise the real challenge.

Online workload is the main difficulty signal; in-person sample is tiny.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

80/100

; one in-person review says yes.

Online is flexible; the .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

64/100

, and EC, despite intense anti-AI paper stress for some.

Recommendations are driven by online reviews; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Often tagged tough but fair and recover with and retakes.

Format shift

and easy-grading comments; in-person only notes EC and niceness.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Weekly papers, material analyses, quizzes, and weeks.

Format shift

Online reviews dominate the heavy-paper picture.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

and clear assignment structure offset complaints about boring lectures and harsh AI tone.

Format shift

Online is mixed-positive; the lone in-person review is mild-positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Grades revolve around weekly papers, quizzes, and EC; some .

Format shift

Online assessment details are rich; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Single and lots of .

Main concern

Too little in-person evidence to judge beyond one positive snapshot.

What students said

“ . and gave alot of .”
19588

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

weekly material analyses, short quizzes, lots of , and strict AI policy.

Main concern

Weekly multi-page papers plus aggressive AI accusations can feel intimidating despite high grades.

What students said

“Honestly, she's a really chill person if you do the work. , and you can retake tests until 100%.”
198588
“I also appreciated the extra-credit assignments as they greatly helped to boost my grade.”
19588
“If her software flags you as AI she has a no tolerance policy to turn you into the dean.”
198588

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment leans papers and short quizzes, with at least and unlimited .

No Midterm/Final ReportedRetake Tests to 100%Short QuizzesPaper-Based Assessment

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Only one in-person review; it does not clearly describe exam format beyond general .

Extra Credit
“ . and gave alot of .”
19588

Online

, and paper-heavy weeks rather than high-stakes proctored finals.

No Midterm/FinalRetake TestsWeekly QuizzesMaterials Analysis Papers
“ , and you can retake tests until 100%.”
198588
“assignments were well-structured, consisting of weekly Materials Analysis and short quizzes”
19588
“Youll , and discussions”
19588

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Honestly, she's a really chill person if you do the work. , and you can retake tests until 100%. The only thing is that I spend 8 hours a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews (13 online, 1 in-person), focusing on papers, , and AI policy. Credibility rating: Medium.

📝

72/100

“This professor is quite nice, but is a . They also give a lot of .”

⚠️ AI Zero Tolerance Stress

30/100

“If her software flags you as AI she has a no tolerance policy to turn you into the dean.”

👍

64/100

“I would say the but fair, and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫

  • lectures are simple and she provides materials
  • Her lectures are boring and long

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Grades

  • required to write a 6 page plus analysis every week
  • super easy way to get your grade up
  • workload is a lot and may be hard to catch up with

Theme 3

🤖 About AI Policy

  • just for not using AI
  • blames you for using AI when you don't even use it
  • no tolerance policy to turn you into the dean

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

14 mostly recent online reviews are detailed and theme-consistent, but and some grade-workload tension lower confidence.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 55
3 out of 53
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

195888 reviews
1985886 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 7 · A 1 · A- 2

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1