AI Rate Professor

English

Linda Fraser

ENGLISH300 · ENGWR302 · ENGW101 · ENGWR300 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
7.69%
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

Avoid unless you specifically want a brutal university-level writing bootcamp and and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderLate FeedbackStrict AttendanceHeavy EssaysPolitical Tangents
  • and failing or near-failing despite effort.
  • Feedback and grades often arrive too late to course-correct.
  • Attendance is strict and workload of .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Comments describe failing near 70, zero scores for not doing things her way, and As.

Nearly all evidence is in-person; the few online reviews also .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

Daily or , and and pace hard for a standard English course.

; online reviews stress reading load and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Multiple students say missing a few classes gets you dropped and .

; online has less attendance detail.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

and most recent comments urge students not to enroll.

Both formats are negative; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

; students report , and refusal to pass borderline work.

Format shift

outcomes reported in person.

Workload

Overwhelming

16/100

Essays nearly daily or weekly plus journals, quizzes, packets, and .

Format shift

In-person mentions 30-page projects and daily handouts; online still reports tons of reading and homework.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Common themes are late grading, unclear instructions, tangents about politics, and a rude or miserable classroom tone.

Format shift

A ; recent tone is strongly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Assessment is essay- and , and occasional debate finals rather than pure exams.

Format shift

In-person emphasizes essays and debates; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person majority describes , and off-topic lectures.

Main concern

Harsh grades, late scoring, and risk of being dropped or .

What students said

“ last minute so you never know what you're standing grade is.”
ENGLISH300
“I got a 69.8 in the class and she failed me and said I didn't deserve to pass”
ENGWR302
“Going to class is mandatory or you get dropped.”
ENGWR300

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Small online sample still reports , and and writing.

Main concern

and delayed responses on online work.

What students said

“ and then will give you a bad grade even when she knows you didn't have the information needed”
ENGWR300
“ because she has trouble updating canvas properly.”
ENGLISH300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Course centers on frequent essays and ; difficulty comes from volume and grading.

Many EssaysPop QuizzesIn-Class WritingDebate FinalHarsh Paper Grading

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a ; reviews do not clearly prove Lockdown Browser.

Pop QuizzesIn-Class EssaysDebate FinalTake-Home Essays
“ and a debate for the final.”
ENGWR302
“You have many in-class essays on top of done”
ENGWR300

Online

Online reviews do not clearly describe proctored exams; and .

Unclear Canvas AssignmentsHeavy ReadingWritten Homework
“She is not very clear with the instructions on what she wants done for the assignments.”
ENGLISH300
“This glorified teacher (not professor) gives assignments and when students ”
ENGWR300

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Please . She didn't grade anything until past the and by then it was already too late.”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews (3 online, 18 in , and workload themes. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫

12/100

“ . She made us write a damn near 30 page paper for ”

⚖️

15/100

“I got a 69.8 in the class and she failed me and said I didn't deserve to pass”

⏰

22/100

“ so you never know what you're standing grade is”

📚 Workload Stack

16/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She goes off on tangents frequently about things completely unrelated to the curriculum
  • she spends more time talking about politics then she does teaching
  • She looks miserable and like she can't stand teaching anymore

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Hardest teacher I've ever had
  • she grades harshly without warning
  • If you miss a

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • she is not the nicest
  • Very stand off-ish and rude if a question is asked
  • I enjoyed her sense of humor

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

21 reviews over many years and workload, though older positive outliers and few online samples lower absolute certainty.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 514

Course coverage

ENGWR3009 reviews
ENGLISH3007 reviews
ENGWR3024 reviews
ENGW1011 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

3

B 2 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

3

D+ 2 · D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 4