AI Rate Professor

Mechanical Engineering

mahdi jahami

MET · 44 lifetime ratings

AI rating
97/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

, and fair with strong pass-focused teaching.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear ExplanationsCaringFair GradingFormula Sheets HelpHidden Gem
  • Every review is five stars with 100 percent would-take-again support.
  • He breaks complex MET and and checks understanding before moving on.
  • Quizzes and and formula sheets are kept current.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Students report , and strong As and A+s when they show up, take notes, and complete work.

Evidence is overwhelmingly in-person; the few online reviews also report easy and positive outcomes.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Material can be technical but he scaffolds concepts with practice problems so .

Both formats describe manageable difficulty with good structure; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

38/100

as mandatory, though class often ends .

Nearly all attendance detail is from in-person MET sections.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Unanimous praise and 100 percent take-again intent with repeated hidden-gem language.

Recommendation is unanimous across online and in-person samples.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

88/100

Students call grading fair and lenient with and ; he aims for students to pass, not fail.

Format shift

Leniency .

Workload

Light

74/100

Work is structured and reasonable if notes and formula sheets stay current; not described as busywork-heavy.

Format shift

Online notes that the class is as easy as you make it; and practice.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

, and real care for understanding make him stand out in the MET program.

Format shift

Excellence is consistent in both formats, with far richer in-person evidence.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

, and exams all matter, with notes and formula sheets central to success.

Format shift

, and exams most; online detail is sparse.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

42 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person majority , and real support when students struggle.

Main concern

and and exams.

What students said

“Professor Jahami is a hidden gem of a teacher within the MET program.”
MET
“Very straight forward, as long as you show up to class and pay attention, and do your work you'll pass .”
MET
“ and he is a great professor.”
MET

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Small online sample still calls him awesome, knowledgeable, and easy if you keep up notes.

Main concern

Still need solid notes and participation; limited online detail overall.

What students said

“Awesome class knowledgeable teacher”
MET
“the class is as easy as you make it on yourself.”
MET

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and and ; students call them fair when preparation is steady.

Formula SheetsWeekly QuizzesClear Practice ProblemsFair ExamsPop Quizzes

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and exams go smoothly with formula sheets and notes; pop quizzes appear but .

Formula SheetsWeekly QuizzesPop QuizzesGroup Projects
“As long as you keep up with your formula sheets the quizzes and .”
MET
“ because you will need them later.”
MET

Online

Online reviews affirm a smooth class experience but do .

Manageable Online WorkNotes Important
“Awesome class knowledgeable teacher”
MET
“The class requires a lot of notes to be able to stay on top of the work”
MET

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Jahami is a hidden gem of a teacher within the MET program.”

Voice snapshots generated from 45 reviews (3 online, 42 in person), highlighting teaching quality, fairness, and support. Credibility rating: High.

🌟 Teaching Excellence

96/100

“This professor is honestly one of the , and I wish every class was taught like this.”

👍

98/100

“ ”

⚖️

88/100

“ and he is a great professor.”

🧭

86/100

“as long as you show up to class and pay attention, and do your work you'll pass .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Breaks down complex math into understandable problems
  • , and easy to follow
  • he focuses on helping students work through the process

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Homework and and reflective of material
  • Class was great, he didn't need to endlessly fill our 3 hours of lecture
  • does not try to fail his students

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Very cool young guy and very knowledgable
  • always willing to help and break down any questions
  • genuine care for their students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

45

Recent reviews read by the AI

44

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

45 recent all-5-star reviews with strong internal consistency on clarity, care, and fairness yield high credibility despite few online samples.

Inside 45 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 545
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MET45 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

41 reported outcomes

A range

23

A+ 7 · A 15 · A- 1

B range

10

B+ 6 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Not sure yet 6