AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Andrea Del Carmen Vazquez

ETHNS300 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

unless you can self-manage chaos and wait months for grades.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized CanvasSlow GradingIgnores EmailsHeavy ReadingAvoid for GE
  • Most students report , and months without grades or feedback.
  • Emails often go unanswered and structure feels random, especially online.
  • A minority liked in-person lectures and lived experience, but still noted disorganization.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

Some students still earn As, but unfair grading, late feedback, and .

Online students feel graded unfairly; in-person outcomes are better but still stressful.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

, and unclear instructions raise the real difficulty beyond the subject alone.

Online difficulty ratings spike; lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

Online is often async with no seat time, while as mandatory.

; in-person more often mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most reviewers urge picking anyone else for GE due to disorganization and .

Online is strongly avoid; a .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Students report tough or , and little timely guidance to improve.

Format shift

Complaints concentrate online; .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of reading, papers, and last-minute modules create constant stress even when content is not advanced.

Format shift

Online workload complaints are strongest.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

, and ; in-person lectures are the main bright spot.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Papers, readings, and module work drive grades with little mention of traditional exams.

Format shift

Both formats are assignment-heavy.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person gets mixed to better reviews for lecture style and lived experience, but and disorganization.

Main concern

Grades update monthly or later and .

What students said

“I liked her lecture style and material. She was quite disorganized, though, and .”
ETHNS300
“I took her in-person class and . She's really funny and relatable.”
ETHNS300
“expect your grades to be updated once a month or more than a month.”
ETHNS300

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online async is widely panned for , and stressful last-minute work.

Main concern

Assignments appear days before due dates and .

What students said

“I didn't get my first graded assignment until 2 months into the semester as well as .”
ETHNS300
“& don't even bother emailing about the to emails”
ETHNS300
“AVOID! Trust me! Didn't grade a ”
ETHNS300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize papers and ; risk is process chaos more than test format.

Paper HeavyReading HeavyUnclear Due DatesSlow Feedback

Assessment risk

Varies

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and graded assignments with slow grade posting; exam details are not clearly described.

Reading HeavySlow Grade Updates
“The class is really stressful the whole semester, I took it in person.”
ETHNS300
“ .”
ETHNS300

Online

Online assessment is heavy papers and weekly work with delayed grades and .

So Many PapersLate ModulesNo Email Response
“required essays to be written for only 2 pt questions. Lots of hw.”
ETHNS300
“takes months to grade. ”
ETHNS300

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you can find another professor for this course, please choose them over her. I didn't get my first graded assignment until 2 months into the semester as well as .”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 recent ETHNS300 reviews with . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“I couldn't even name 3 concepts that she taught effectively.”

📉 Organization Crisis

20/100

“Work assigned a few days before it's due, modules being added week by week.”

📧 Communication Failure

15/100

“ forever to grade assignments.”

👍

70/100

“I took her in-person class and . She's really funny and relatable.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I liked her lecture style and material. , though
  • She's queer and BIPOC so it truly feels like she is teaching from lived experience
  • You can tell this professor isn't used to online coursework

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The class overall isn't hard, but there are definitely better professors out there
  • expect your grades to be updated once a month or more than a month
  • grades unfairly, ignores emails, takes months to grade

Theme 3

⚠️ About Course Logistics

  • Would post a .
  • She had absolutely no structure & caused everyone stress&anxiety.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Only 12 reviews but recent, detailed, and highly consistent on disorganization and slow response, especially online.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 57

Course coverage

ETHNS30012 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

3

B+ 3

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1