AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Luis Mendez-Nunez

MATH351 · MATH350 · MATH120 · MATH400 · MATH372 · LEC19093 · MATH352 · MATH373 · MATH335 · MAT351 · MATH34 · MATH370 · MATH100 · MATH104 · MATH · MATH103 · STAT300 · INTROTOSTATS · MATH401 · STATS300 · 173 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
28.85%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid unless you already excel at math, self-study heavily, and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTest HeavyTough GraderLecture HeavyAccent And Handwriting BarriersNo Homework Credit
  • Polarizing math professor with and
  • Grades rest almost entirely on quizzes and
  • Self-motivated students who practice outside class can learn a lot; others struggle hard

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

An A demands heavy outside practice; , and no easy path.

Online and ; in-person has more grade detail.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

26/100

, and material is treated as serious college math.

; online also calls courses extremely challenging.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

excess absences; skip-class warnings are common.

In-person is clearly mandatory; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

29/100

Would-take-again sits near 29% with .

Online reviews are almost all negative; in-person is split but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

; little partial credit and almost no for most sections.

Format shift

; online adds grading chaos from wrong keys.

Workload

Light

68/100

, but students must self-drill or .

Format shift

Both formats stress no graded HW; real study load still high because of tests.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

and caring; many cite accent, messy board work, rants, and .

Format shift

In-person is mixed; online teaching quality is mostly rated poorly.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

, and a cumulative final.

Format shift

Test-heavy design is consistent online and in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

45 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and board writing hard for many; some still learn deeply if they grind.

Main concern

, and hard-to-follow lectures drive many drops and low grades.

What students said

“If you are looking for an easy A, he is definitely not your guy lol.”
MATH400
“ .”
math372

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections are widely called disorganized, with , and heavy self-drive.

Main concern

Disorganization, error-prone keys, and little direct instruction make online especially risky.

What students said

“he is so disorganized... 3-8 CANVAS notifs A DAY with .”
STAT300
“he uses other professors' videos to teach his class, he isn't teaching at all.”
STAT300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Grades hinge on frequent hard quizzes and low score.

Test HeavyMultiple ExamsLowest Exam DroppedFormula Cards SometimesHard Tests

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and exams; notes often restricted with formula sheets only.

Test HeavyPop QuizzesNo Notes OftenDrop Lowest Test
“Notes are not allowed but he gives you formula cards that .”
STAT300
“Every point towards your grade comes from quizzes, 5 exams, and a final.”
MATH373

Online

Online assessments are quizzes and units with reported answer-key errors and little lecture support.

QuizzesSelf-Driven ExamsError-Prone Keys
“His are riddled with errors everywhere, and that's where our grades come from.”
STAT300
“ , but extremely challenging class.”
MATH373

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you are looking for an easy A, he is definitely not your guy lol.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting test-only grading and polarized teaching. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“I learned the majority of the class on my own through Youtube.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

29/100

“yea dont even think about it”

📝

88/100

“ , but if you are not doing problems outside of class forget about getting an A.”

🗣️ Clarity Barriers

30/100

“His accent and mediocre handwriting made it more difficult to learn.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he's always willing to answer questions and demonstrate further
  • makes easy thing into a complicated mess

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • you will DEFINITELY learn the material if

Theme 3

⚠️ About Online Chaos

  • . He does not . At all.
  • It's hell. Even if you have a calendar... Don't.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

173

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews over many years with rich detail, mixed grades, and and teaching friction.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 527
4 out of 539
3 out of 519
2 out of 539
1 out of 550

Course coverage

STAT30014 reviews
MATH3737 reviews
MATH4004 reviews
math3723 reviews
MATH1002 reviews
Show 16 more courses
MATH1032 reviews
MATH3352 reviews
MATH342 reviews
MATH3512 reviews
1201 review
INTROTOSTATS1 review
LEC190931 review
MAT3511 review
MATH1 review
MATH1041 review
MATH1201 review
MATH3501 review
MATH3521 review
MATH3701 review
MATH4011 review
STATS3001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

47 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 4 · A 8

B range

10

B 8 · B- 2

C range

8

C+ 4 · C 4

D range

2

D 2

F

3

F 3

No letter grade reported

12

Drop/Withdrawal 6 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 2