AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Systems

Jatinder Singh

CISP430 · CISP360 · CISP400 · CISP301 · CISP457 · 40 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
82.5%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you will code consistently; be cautious with online sections if accents or long video lectures bother you.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyGives good feedbackInspirationalRespectedGroup projectsLots of homework
  • Strong in-person programming teacher who simplifies C++ and motivates beginners.
  • , and and grades.
  • Recent online reviews criticize accent, monotone long videos, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Many strong grades and some Easy A comments, but and .

One online review called it very easy via textbook weight; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Intro programming can feel approachable with him, while data structures and .

Online CISP360 split easy vs hard; but .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and stress skipping hurts participation and quizzes.

In-person almost always mandatory; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

High would-take-again rate and and online complaints.

In-person recommendations dominate; online recent reviews are much cooler.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Often called fair with and partial help, though some say no partial credit and .

Format shift

; online tougher-grader tags appear more.

Workload

Heavy

38/100

, and group projects add up, especially in summer.

Format shift

Both formats mention lots of homework; and projects dominate comments.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

and passion; minority cite monotone lectures and accent barriers.

Format shift

In-person teaching praised as excellent; online lecture delivery criticized more.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

, and group projects more than pure exams.

Format shift

and in-class coding; one review notes open-book midterm/final.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

36 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

passionate programming teaching, helpful feedback, real-world insight, and .

Main concern

Attendance and ; .

What students said

“Best programming professor in Sacramento City College!!”
CISP400
“ !”
CISP301
“ no one else can teach better than him.”
CISP430

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

some call it easy with , and grading unforgiving.

Main concern

Long video lectures and accent comprehension issues without strong live interaction.

What students said

“Very easy class in general because the textbook can be done multiple times and is weighted the .”
CISP360
“Boring and a . Just has hours of videos of him talking”
CISP360
“he has the most monotone voice ever and I could never really watch his entire lectures”
CISP430

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment mixes quizzes, midterms/finals, and large coding or group projects; one review notes open-book exams.

Chapter quizzesMidterm and finalOpen-book exams mentionedGroup project heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and group projects; one student reported open-book exams matching Quizlet.

Weekly quizzesOpen-book midterm/finalGroup project ~20%
“Midterm and because they're open book and almost all questions are word for word from quizlet.”
CISP400
“There are and he provides the ”
CISP457

Online

Online reviews focus more on homework and .

Homework heavyQuizzes weighted with textbook work
“the textbook can be done multiple times and is weighted the ”
CISP360

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Best programming professor in Sacramento City College!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 40 reviews, emphasizing programming teaching and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“Professor and simplify it into a language understandable to his students.”

👍 Recommendation

82/100

“I highly recommend him, He is part time professor, if you see his name .”

💻 Coding Workload

38/100

“Be and home.”

🗣️ Accent & Delivery Concerns

40/100

“If you have a hard time with .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • never felt bored single time
  • monotone voice
  • English not up to par

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A
  • Do the work, get an A
  • Lots of homework
  • but

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Inspirational
  • Caring
  • Really Nice!! Easy going and very helpful

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

40

Recent reviews read by the AI

40

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

40 reviews with strong in-person consistency; only 4 online reviews make the online split less certain but .

Inside 40 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 531
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

CISP40012 reviews
CISP36010 reviews
CISP4578 reviews
CISP3017 reviews
CISP4303 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 1 · A 10

B range

6

B 6

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2