AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

James Town

Courses not reported · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if ; do not expect strong lectures.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-learning focusedExtra creditClear grading criteriaInspirationalWeak lecture videos
  • All five reviews are online and grades reported are A/A+.
  • Three short glowing reviews contrast with detailed critiques of almost no teaching.
  • Course structure can and feedback.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

All reported grades are A or A+ despite uneven teaching, with tags in places.

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

Difficulty ratings are low-to-moderate, but labs can take 5+ hours and stress self-learners.

Online-only sample; no in-person comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

85/100

Most .

Evidence comes only from online classes.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

, but detailed comments warn about zero teaching.

Online-only; short praise versus substantive criticism.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

Students report high grades, , and .

Format shift

Online-only evidence.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

About one lab per week that and .

Format shift

Online-only evidence.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Short reviews call him great, while longer and does not teach.

Format shift

All five reviews are online and mixed in depth.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Weekly labs dominate effort; midterm and .

Format shift

Online-only evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

brief praise for being awesome/great, plus detailed notes that he barely teaches and .

Main concern

and useless textbook leave learning to YouTube and peers.

What students said

“he really teaches very well !”
26899
“Zero teaching. Everything I learned was through youTube, other programming textbooks”
360
“The professor doesn't teach, but his course gives a .”
26899

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are short coding/debug style; .

Midterm and final coding questionsWeekly labsClear grading criteria

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Students describe midterm/final with about 10 coding or fix-the-code questions; proctoring not mentioned.

10-question midterm/finalCode correction tasksWeekly labs
“1 lab per week, total of 16 labs. Midterm/final have 10 questions (given some problematic code and you correct it, writing a function...)”
26899

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The professor doesn't teach, but his course gives a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 online reviews with limited detail. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Zero teaching. Everything I learned was through youTube”

👍 High Grades

82/100

“he is awesome !”

🧭 Self-Learning Fit

70/100

“his course gives a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he really teaches very well !
  • Zero teaching
  • weekly 7 min videos,

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and they take me 5+ hours on average
  • Grade A+

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only 5 online reviews, three very short and same-day, so reliability is limited despite consistent A grades.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

268993 reviews
3602 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 3 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values