AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Andrew Otsuki

CHEM400 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
90/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Take him for CHEM400/401 if you will show up, use office hours, and bank the .

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtra credit heavyAmazing lecturesAccessible outside classTest heavyCaring
  • Most students love his clarity, humor, office hours, and large buffer
  • , and
  • A minority report tough grading or

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Heavy , review sessions, and if you put in steady effort.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

CHEM content can be hard, but and examples keep average difficulty moderate for most students.

In-person only; no online comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

24/100

and treat showing up as part of the grade path.

In-person evidence only; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

About 80% take-again energy with detractors.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

and fair exams help many students; a minority still call him a .

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Some report little homework and flexible deadlines; others note labs, exams, and .

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Excellent

84/100

, and strong student rapport dominate, with a few teaching-skill critiques.

Format shift

In-person only across recent years.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Tags and comments stress tests, labs, and .

Format shift

In-person only; test-heavy tags are common.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, workshops, and lots of EC; attendance is typically required.

Main concern

A few students feel grading is tough or favoritism-based and that .

What students said

“he offers SO MUCH and has a lot of office hours and workshops”
CHEM400
“ and he gives you tons of opportunities”
401
“Andrew and favors favoritism with certain students”
CHEM400

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Standard in-person chem exams with practice materials and EC; friendliness comes from support and .

Test heavyExtra creditReview sessionsOld exams practicePossible curves

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Exams and ; students get practice packets, review sessions, and often large EC or curves.

Test heavyExtra creditReview sessionsIn-person exams
“Exams and , and he offered a lot of if needed”
401
“When the class struggled ”
CHEM400

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Possibly the . and flexible deadlines... he offers SO MUCH .”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 in-person reviews, highlighting lectures, , and support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“ and include a lot of examples”

🎁 Buffer

90/100

“he offers SO MUCH ”

👍 Recommendation

82/100

“10/10 prof, one of the ”

⚠️ Minority Critique

35/100

“ so students can understand”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and include a lot of examples
  • he's also super funny and
  • fun personality and strong work ethic

Theme 2

📈 About Grades & EC

  • tons of opportunities
  • study and you'll do good

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • So caring for his students
  • always around for help

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Ten detailed recent in-person reviews with mostly consistent praise support medium-high confidence.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHEM4006 reviews
4014 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 3 · B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1