AI Rate Professor

English

Dawna Demartini

ENGWR101 · ENGWR51 · ENGWR302 · ENGWR100 · INDIS313 · ENGW50 · ENGLISHWR51 · ENGWR303 · ENG · ENG100 · ENGWR300 · 80 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
93.75%
Difficulty
1.8

The decision

Take her for almost any English or first-year course if you want a chill, high-grade writing class.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy ASelf-gradingCaringHilarious lecturesGreat feedback
  • Students repeatedly call her the best English professor and a guaranteed A with light work.
  • She breaks writing , and accepts late work.
  • A small minority say jokes crowd out content or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

93/100

Comments stress guaranteed A with , and light weekly work.

Both formats call it easy A; strongest guaranteed-A language is in person.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

86/100

Low difficulty ratings and comments about few short assignments and manageable writing steps.

Online and in person both describe light content load.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

58/100

while many others say it is not required.

Online ; in person is mixed.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

Near-universal take-again praise with and courses.

Recommendation is strong in both formats.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

92/100

Self-grading, , late work accepted, and many A or A+ reports.

Format shift

Leniency appears in both formats.

Workload

Light

88/100

, and no heavy textbook load.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

93/100

, and real writing improvement.

Format shift

In-person praise is deeper; online still very positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and projects dominate; finals sometimes replaced.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

43 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews overwhelmingly praise , and a near-guaranteed A.

Main concern

A few older reviews felt she joked too much or .

What students said

“Pretty much a guaranteed A if you just show up to class”
ENGWR303
“Her class was very easy and as long as you're up to date, you are guaranteed an A”
ENGWR302
“allows self-grading, great commenting, helps with getting things right”
ENGWR100

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online students still call her amazing, flexible, and fair with creative assignments and strong support.

Main concern

Some online sections still expect participation and reading.

What students said

“She's understanding, engaging, and devoted to making you a better writer.”
ENGWR302
“Very flexible to the students' needs and very caring.”
ENGWR300
“She doesn't give a workload of homework and .”
INDIS313

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

High-stakes exams are rarely emphasized; work is mostly assignments and writing projects.

Few or no high-stakes finalsSlideshows or projects instead of finalsEssay-focused assessment

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and used easy slideshows or .

No final in some sectionsEssay feedback focusSelf-grading
“We did not have a but rather some slideshows which were rather easy to do.”
ENGWR302

Online

Online reviews emphasize creative assignments and guidance rather than strict proctored exams.

Creative online assignmentsFeedback-heavy grading
“All of the online class.”
ENGWR302

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Pretty much a guaranteed A if you just show up to class”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, , and light workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

93/100

“Honestly the .”

🅰️ Easy A Path

93/100

“Easy A”

💬 Feedback and Care

92/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation

94/100

“ !!!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • So chill! Really made me enjoy writing.
  • Her lectures were fun and I was always looking forward to attending.
  • lectures on the logical pathway to critical thinking changed my thinking.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Pretty much a guaranteed A if you just show up to class
  • the work was easy.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She is very caring, enthusiastic, and
  • Professor Demartini was very sweet and polite.
  • and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

80

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed reviews over many years show highly consistent praise with only a few older outliers.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 573
4 out of 55
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGWR30017 reviews
ENGWR3028 reviews
ENGWR517 reviews
INDIS3134 reviews
ENGWR1003 reviews
Show 8 more courses
ENGWR1013 reviews
ENGWR3032 reviews
1011 review
511 review
ENG1 review
ENG1001 review
ENGLISH WR511 review
ENGW501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

35 reported outcomes

A range

28

A+ 13 · A 15

B range

4

B+ 3 · B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1