AI Rate Professor

Allied Health

Camille Johnson-Arthur

SOC310 · SOC375 · AH110 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
11.11%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

unless you have no alternative and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderUnclear InstructionsPoor CommunicationAvoidInconsistent Expectations
  • Students repeatedly call instructions and .
  • Harsh grading and .
  • One older online review praised light workload, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Some students still earn A or A+, but tough grading, mismatched rubrics, and .

Both online and ; online adds more complaints about unclear rubrics.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

, and unclear expectations make the content and process feel hard.

Online reviews emphasize unclear instructions and reading load; and weak guidance.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

as mandatory in some sections and not mandatory in others, so flexibility depends on the class.

Online and single consistent policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Nearly all recent reviews urge students not to and poor communication.

Online and one older positive online outlier.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Tough grader tags dominate, and students say .

Format shift

Online reviews especially stress mismatched rubrics; .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of , and test-heavy tags appear often.

Format shift

One older online review described light work, but most online and .

Teaching experience

Awful

16/100

, and lack of dedication across courses.

Format shift

and in person.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and tests rather than one single focus.

Format shift

Online mentions mini quizzes and discussions; and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and low dedication, with little praise for instruction quality.

Main concern

and weak classroom leadership with .

What students said

“She's AWFUL! She's forgetful and vacuous.”
AH110
“She's just bad...a very bad professor. Inconsistent with communication and instructions.”
SOC310
“the . didn't want to give us a study guide”
AH110

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online SOC sections are widely panned for , and weak communication, with only one older outlier calling it an easy credit.

Main concern

because expectations are unclear.

What students said

“ ! Do not enroll in any of her classes, I say again. She is a . Her rubrics and directions never match.”
SOC310
“ so . Good topics but she's a .”
SOC310
“Do not take her. Do not take her. .”
SOC375

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and quizzes but do not clearly prove unusually friendly or strict proctoring policies.

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

One hybrid-era review says students pushed for an ; broader closed-book policy is not clearly proven.

Open Book When PressuredStudy From Homework
“We pressured her into giving us the so we could use it open book.”
AH110

Online

Online comments mention mini quizzes and , but .

Mini QuizzesTest Heavy
“Also, there were two mini quizzes during weeks 4 and 8, and they were pretty easy too.”
SOC310
“ .”
SOC310

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! Do not enroll in any of her classes, I say again. She is a . Her rubrics and directions never match.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, , and avoidance themes. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Teaching Quality

16/100

“She's just bad...a very bad professor. Inconsistent with communication and instructions.”

📉 Recommendation Rate

12/100

“Do not take her. Do not take her. .”

⚖️

18/100

“ . She takes days to reply to emails.”

📚

22/100

“You will think you followed every step correctly and get a low grade because ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's just bad...a very bad professor.
  • Terrible communicator, very slow on replying back
  • She's forgetful and vacuous.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She's a .
  • Her rubrics and directions never match.
  • the .

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • unless you don't care for proper communication with your professor.
  • she made me wait 40 minutes in waiting room then when she finally entered she hung up

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Nine detailed reviews span 2019-2025 and are and poor communication, but the sample is still modest.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 54
1 out of 54

Course coverage

SOC3106 reviews
AH1102 reviews
SOC3751 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1