AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Angelo Williams

SOC321 · SOC301 · SOC310 · SOCIOLOGY300 · SOC300 · 35 lifetime ratings

AI rating
56/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
56.25%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Consider him for engaging in-person sociology if you can self-manage; be cautious with online sections because support and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPassionate LecturerSlow GradingEmail Black HoleDiscussion HeavyDisorganized Online
  • In-person students often love his passion, humor, and mind-opening sociology discussions.
  • Online and short-term sections frequently , and ignored emails.
  • Coursework can be easy and reading-heavy, but organization is the make-or-break factor.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

72/100

Many students earn As by reading, participating, and turning in writing, even when the professor is disorganized.

Online As ; in-person As and participation.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Material is frequently called manageable or easy, with heavier reading and writing rather than conceptual traps.

A , but most recent tone is easy-to-moderate.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

52/100

and participation-critical, while others are more flexible or asynchronous.

; in-person comments more often say show up and participate.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

because passion fans and organization critics cancel each other out.

In-person recommendations are warmer; online recommendations are much weaker.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Grades are often high and work is described as fair, but and late.

Format shift

Online and delayed gradebook updates.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Expect weekly discussions, readings, and .

Format shift

Online short sessions sometimes post very few assignments; in-person can include group work and longer reading.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

He can be an inspirational, funny lecturer, but disorganization and poor responsiveness drag the overall experience.

Format shift

Teaching praise is stronger in person; online reviews focus on absence more than lecture quality.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

, and occasional tests tied to the book.

Format shift

Online leans writing and discussions; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and participation, though some still call lectures off-topic, book-dependent, or disorganized.

Main concern

Tests and readings can surprise students if lectures do not match the book.

What students said

“He is the reason I am a sociology major.”
SOC321
“By doing this you will have an A no problem!”
SOC300
“Honestly one of the .”
SOC321

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews cluster around easy content but weak instructor presence: delayed grades, missing posts, and .

Main concern

Students must chase the professor to post or grade work, which is risky on a tight schedule.

What students said

“the professor's communication is atrocious and disorganization is maddening!”
SOC300
“It was a perfect summer course although he does but is overall a good professor!”
SOC310
“he never responded to emails and still has not graded anything”
SOC321

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and papers appear standard and manageable when students read, without clear evidence of strict online proctoring.

Essay ExamsWeekly WritingBook-Based TestsDiscussion Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and some difficult long tests; lectures may not always match what is tested.

ParticipationBook-Based TestsWriting AssignmentsOccasional Long Exams
“Tests and if you study.”
SOC300
“ and 3/4th of the class failed it.”
SOC300

Online

, and delayed grading; webcam or Lockdown Browser is not clearly proven.

DiscussionsEssay ExamsFew Graded ItemsDelayed Grading
“the work itself is OK (easy questions and DBs, not a ton of )”
SOC300
“ and a few essays!”
SOC310

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Prof Williams is a very passionate teacher who is more concerned with his students actually learning, rather than just regurgitating the info to pass a test.”

Voice snapshots generated from 35 reviews (8 online, 27 in person), contrasting passion-heavy in-person praise with online organization complaints. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“He is a real great teacher. At first its hard to get used to his style, but then you realize he is a no extra work and great Professor.”

📡 Communication Gap

25/100

“This professor does NOT respond to e-mails, and takes ”

📈 Easy Coursework

72/100

“he was the easiest teacher i ever had i like him alot i got a B almost an A and i barely tried”

👍 Recommendation Split

52/100

“ life changing experience.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's never boring in his lectures and grasps your attention
  • He loves what he lectures and it's obvious he is very, very passionate
  • His lecture style is convoluted and difficult to follow

Theme 2

📉 About Organization

  • students have to remind him to post his material
  • whole 8 weeks
  • SO DISORGANIZED!!!!!!

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Not an easy A. You have to do the work and RESEARCH
  • Easy class with a lot of infor just wish the professor was more involved

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

35

Recent reviews read by the AI

35

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-five reviews over many years give a consistent dual portrait of passionate teaching versus weak organization, especially online.

Inside 35 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 519
4 out of 56
3 out of 53
2 out of 55
1 out of 52

Course coverage

SOC32114 reviews
SOC30011 reviews
SOC3015 reviews
3212 reviews
SOC3102 reviews
Show 1 more courses
SOCIOLOGY3001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

24 reported outcomes

A range

18

A+ 6 · A 11 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3