AI Rate Professor

Allied Health

EmmyLou DeGuzman

AH110 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Avoid unless you only need an and can teach yourself the whole course.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-Taught RequiredNo Useful FeedbackDisorganized CanvasOpen-Book QuizzesLow Instructor Presence
  • Most reviews say there is little teaching, vague instructions, and .
  • One positive outlier reports easy open-book multiple-choice quizzes with two untimed attempts.
  • Students can still pass or A the class by self-studying or googling, but learning and support are weak.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Several students still earned As through open-book quizzes or self-googling despite learning almost nothing.

Easy-grade evidence is almost entirely online; the .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Content can be manageable with the book, but confusing instructions and .

Online comments drive this judgment; .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

80/100

as not mandatory for asynchronous AH work.

Online is largely asynchronous; the .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Half or fewer would take her again, and the and no help.

One online student recommends the easy open-book setup; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Students report open-book multi-attempt quizzes and even a blank submission still marked complete.

Format shift

Leniency evidence is online; .

Workload

Light

64/100

One detailed review says no homework beyond four quizzes and a final, while .

Format shift

Online workload reports conflict between few graded items and .

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Students repeatedly say she does not , and is hard to reach.

Format shift

Both online and the and low teaching presence.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

of quizzes and a final, with little ongoing homework weight.

Format shift

Online reviews provide the exam-centered picture; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single in-person review describes a condescending instructor who refused pandemic-era help and .

Main concern

Lack of empathy and support when students need help.

What students said

“If you want a professor who lacks empathy and is just an overall condescending person, this is the professor for you.”
AH110

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online AH sections are mostly described as self-taught with , and , though one student found open-book quizzes easy.

Main concern

No reliable teaching, feedback, or .

What students said

“No teaching happening here. Provided PPT are pure text and just outlines each textbook chapter”
AH110
“all were open book. You could take each exam 2 times and they were not timed.”
AH110
“Get ready to teach yourself without help”
AH110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

When described, and no timing pressure.

Open BookUntimed QuizzesTwo AttemptsMultiple Choice

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

84/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The or proctoring.

Online

One clear online review describes four 50-point open-book MC quizzes and one 100-point open-book final, untimed with two attempts each.

Open BookUntimedTwo AttemptsMultiple Choice
“There is so you're graded on 4 50pt (MC) quizzes and 1 final 100pt (MC) all were open book.”
AH110
“You could take each exam 2 times and they were not timed.”
AH110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Get ready to teach yourself without help”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews (5 online, 1 in person), emphasizing self-teaching burden and the open-book outlier. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“No teaching happening here. Provided PPT are pure text and just outlines each textbook chapter, so they aren't useful.”

📈 Easy Grade Path

76/100

“Only Aced class cause I googled the answers.”

👎 Recommendation

28/100

“AH 301 - Avoid.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Wasn't willing to answer questions
  • I emailed countless times and so did my peers and would get very vague non-useful responses or none at all

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The class was easy if you use the book
  • Turned in blank document by accident and still got a complete
  • It was due to the pandemic and the lack of help from the teacher

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • lacks empathy and is just an overall condescending person
  • She tried to teach me a lesson by not helping

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Only six reviews with one positive outlier and limited recent detail make the but statistically thin.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

AH1106 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1