AI Rate Professor

English

Beverly Harrington

ENG300 · ENG100 · ENGWR300 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Strong pick for in-person English if you want a fun, supportive instructor, but if .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyFunny and wittyClear expectationsHelpful and approachableHeavy homework onlineMakes writing fun
  • Older in-person reviews praise her as , and one of the
  • The single recent online review warns of and strongly advises against taking her
  • Little grade data and and grading less certain

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Almost no letter grades are reported, and the only As.

Online evidence is one harsh workload review; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Writing courses are described as enjoyable and .

Online difficulty rated 5; most in-person difficulty ratings cluster around 3.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

Online review lists attendance as mandatory; .

Mandatory called out only for the online ENGWR300 section.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Warm historical praise outweighs one recent online warning, but .

In-person reviewers rave; the sole online .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

and syllabus was not followed; others .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Recent online student reports way too much work; older reviews rarely complain about volume.

Format shift

Heavy-load warning is from the single online review.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students repeatedly , and among the best English teachers, with a few older quality hits.

Format shift

In-person praise is strong; online quality rating is 1.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

English writing courses center on assignments and .

Format shift

No format-specific .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and among the best English teachers, with one critique of unclear grading and going off topic.

Main concern

and off-topic lectures.

What students said

“Beverly is probably the . and approachable, down-to-earth and sweet.”
ENGWR300
“ 2014 class and had a blast, one of the funniest class ever.”
ENG300
“I never liked writing class, she made me love it, the .”
ENG100

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One recent online ENGWR300 review reports far too much work and .

Main concern

.

What students said

“Gives you way too much work. .”
ENGWR300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring rules.

Online

review.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Beverly is probably the . and approachable, down-to-earth and sweet.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting teaching warmth versus a single recent online workload warning. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Charm

78/100

“ 2014 class and had a blast, one of the funniest class ever.”

❤️ Writing Confidence Boost

80/100

“I never liked writing class, she made me love it, the .”

📚 Online Workload Warning

20/100

“Gives you way too much work. .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • one of the funniest class ever
  • Prof. Harrington is a pocket full of awesome.

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • helpful and approachable, down-to-earth and sweet
  • She is so .
  • She makes writing fun

Theme 3

⚠️

  • Gives you way too much work. .
  • She does not stick to the syllabus.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews span 2007-2025 with consistent early praise but only one recent online voice and almost no grade or .

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGWR3004 reviews
ENG3003 reviews
ENG1002 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Audit/No Grade 1