AI Rate Professor

Mechanical Engineering

Bradley Pruhdel

Courses not reported · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

; students and little real teaching support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderDoes not teachUnrealistic workloadHarsh on detailsRude and uncaring
  • All seven reviews give quality 1 and difficulty 5 with
  • Students say he assigns heavy work, grades tiny mistakes harshly, and answers questions poorly
  • Lectures rely on slow prerecorded videos and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

25/100

Some students still earn A or B grades, but and heavy work with little teaching help.

All evidence is in-person.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

8/100

Every review rates difficulty 5 and describes unrealistic timelines and .

All evidence is in-person.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

as mandatory across the reviews with no flexibility mentioned.

All evidence is in-person.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Every student either says avoid him or describes a terrible experience with .

All evidence is in-person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

and comments about harsh penalties for small mistakes dominate every review.

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Students report lots of , and unrealistic short deadlines.

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Reviews call him not a teacher, rude, and and YouTube lectures.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Tags and and papers.

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Every in-person review of course 374 is quality 1, , and unforgiving grading.

Main concern

No compassion, harsh penalties on small mistakes, and weak instructional support.

What students said

“Terrible. He is rude and likes to give out unrealistic amount work that's due in such a short time. ”
374
“Not a teacher! Doesn't care to teach for the student success.”
374
“ ”
374

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and test-heavy structure without spelling out open-book or proctoring tools.

Test heavyTough graderLots of homework

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and but do not clearly prove proctoring software or open-book rules.

Test heavyTough grader
“ part of the assignment, very tough on students and details”
374

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 uniformly negative in-person reviews on course 374. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Teaching Disaster

10/100

“Not a teacher! Doesn't care to teach for the student success.”

⚖️

10/100

“even small mistakes can lead to harsh penalties”

📚 Overwhelming Work

12/100

“likes to give out unrealistic amount work that's due in such a short time.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Doesn't teach only, tells you to look in course
  • Slow prerecorded lecture. YouTube videos for lecture.
  • Will not answer straight questions.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • even small mistakes can lead to harsh penalties
  • Lot of homework.

Theme 3

💔 About Character

  • He is rude
  • This professor has no compassion for students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Seven recent same-course reviews are fully consistent on quality 1, difficulty 5, and .

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 57

Course coverage

3747 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B- 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2