AI Rate Professor

Business

Andre Jordan

BUS340 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you want an engaged Business Law experience and can handle uneven structure and limited instructor responsiveness.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarized Business LawPop quizzesHeavy readingSlow online responsesMock trial experience
  • Only five reviews create a sharp split between inspiring in-person praise and .
  • Expect reading, participation, quizzes or exams, and .
  • The single online review flags slow communication and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Positive students still say not an easy A, and and .

In-person evidence drives the hard-work picture; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Reading before class, pop quizzes, and interesting lectures.

and exams; and mock trial work.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and participation pressure.

In-person is clearly mandatory; the .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

40/100

Two glowing recommendations clash with and one cautious online report, near a 40 percent take-again rate.

In-person opinions are polarized; online evidence is a single negative service review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

, and claims of testing uncovered material make grading feel unforgiving for some.

Format shift

In-person strictness is clearest; online mainly complains about delayed grades, not generosity.

Workload

Moderate

44/100

A and quizzes create moderate, not featherlight, work.

Format shift

Online notes reading and exams; , and quiz pressure.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Some find lectures interesting, clear, and inspirational, while others feel unsupported and .

Format shift

In-person teaching praise is stronger; online access and .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

74/100

Quizzes, exams, and limited graded items .

Format shift

Online is test-heavy with few graded items; , and some papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and a mock trial, while two warn about pop quizzes, unfair testing, and little support.

Main concern

, and exams on material skipped in lecture.

What students said

“ .”
BUS340
“50 page study guide for first exam 1 day to prepare, no ”
BUS340
“Professor tested on things not covered in lecture.”
BUS340

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One online BUS340 review reports delayed , and weak fit for an 8-week format.

Main concern

Slow access and .

What students said

“I waited several weeks for a response to an email. My first written assignment was graded in the last week of the class.”
BUS340

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Standard law-course testing with quizzes and exams; friendliness varies and .

Online quizzes and examsPop quizzesStudy guidesMock trialNo study guides online

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and exams, pop quizzes, a large last-minute study guide, and a mock trial.

Pop quizzesOnline tests and quizzesMock trialLarge study guide
“Test and and lectures are very interesting. We had a mock trial and it was a great learning experience.”
BUS340
“50 page study guide for first exam 1 day to prepare, no ”
BUS340
“Professor tested on things not covered in lecture.”
BUS340

Online

One online review says quizzes and and does not confirm webcam proctoring.

Quizzes and examsNo study guidesLate assignment grading
“No review or .”
BUS340

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Take Professor Jordan if you're excited to learn and ready to do the work”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, capturing sharp positive and negative extremes with low sample credibility. Credibility rating: Low.

⚖️ Polarized Recommendation

40/100

“I'm not sure what the bad comments are about, but I didn't experience any of that in my BusLaw class.”

🚨 Support and Fairness Concerns

30/100

“Doesn't care about students passing his class..”

📚 Reading and Quiz Load

44/100

“Need to do the reading before class. Not an easy A.”

🐢 Online Responsiveness Gap

25/100

“I waited several weeks for a response to an email.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Prof. Jordan made it easy as well as made me feel comfortable within the environment.
  • lectures are very interesting
  • Lectures are fairly interesting, and understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Not an easy A.
  • 50 page study guide for first exam 1 day to prepare, no
  • Professor tested on things not covered in lecture.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Course Logistics

  • My first written assignment was graded in the last week of the class.
  • Was 30 minutes late to .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only five reviews, strong polarity, and thin online evidence make the picture unstable.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

BUS3405 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1