AI Rate Professor

English

Maureen Dana

ENGWR100 · ENG321 · ENGW51 · ENGWR50 · ENGLT320 · ENG50 · ENGWR51 · ENGRD300 · ENGLA50 · ENGWR300 · ENG320 · ENGWR101 · ENWR100 · AMLIT321 · ENGLT311 · ENGLT321 · INDIS313 · ENGWR301 · ENGWR59 · 97 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
67.74%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want a and will follow her format closely, revise drafts, and put in real writing work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough GraderCaring MentorLots of PapersEssay Revisions AllowedGet Ready to Read
  • Many , and willingness to help if you use office hours and revise.
  • She is widely labeled a and heavy reading or papers.
  • Attendance and participation often matter; and communication get mixed reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

48/100

As are common when you revise, use office hours, and match her format, but she is repeatedly called a and .

Online students more often report easy As; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

, and revisions rather than abstract theory, with difficulty rising in lit survey and developmental writing.

Online sections often feel lighter; in-person lit and writing can feel denser with more reading and papers.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and skipping hurts, though a few online or intro success classes report more flexibility.

sections.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

and growth in writing, despite tough grading complaints.

Online and and frustrated critics.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

; she wants specific formats and can be picky, though revisions and office hours improve scores.

Format shift

Online comments and .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Expect , and group work; some courses feel light while .

Format shift

Online often reports average work; in-person writing and lit can stack more papers.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

, and ; critics cite dry lectures, disorganization, or hostility on opinions.

Format shift

In-person teaching praise is broader; online and communication.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grades revolve around , and participation more than big timed finals alone.

Format shift

Both formats are paper and assignment driven; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

44 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person English and lit classes mix strong care and , and heavy reading; outcomes depend heavily on whether students follow her exact expectations.

Main concern

, and strict attendance can frustrate students who want flexibility.

What students said

“She allows revisions and she wants you to succeed, but you must put in the work as well.”
ENGWR300
“She has a specific way she wants papers written, and if you do not write the pass the course.”
ENGWR300
“As long as you show up and try, she'll help you pass.”
ENGWR300

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online sections can feel easy for organized students with and discussion boards, but , and weak communication.

Main concern

and communication when fully online.

What students said

“If you want an easy A . Dana. Easy coursework and easy to follow. .”
ENGWR301
“My main issue was the lack of proper communication, which involved not properly taking the she did.”
ENGWR301
“Prof. Dana's class was honestly super easy, avg. amount of work, and I felt like I learned alot.”
ENGLT311

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly papers and in-class essays with revision opportunities rather than high-tech proctored exams.

In-class essaysOut-of-class papersRevisions allowedDiscussion heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person courses often include multiple out-of-class papers plus department-style in-class essays, with revisions and office-hour help.

In-class essaysMultiple out-of-class papersRevisionsPeer review
“There was 3 in class essays [department standard] and 4 out of class essays.”
ENGWR101
“She allows you to revise any of !”
ENGWR300

Online

Online reviews describe discussion boards, short readings, essays, and timed-ish .

Discussion boardsEssays and short responsesNo clear proctoring mentioned
“There are the , and essay but she gives LOTS of time and gives out reminders of what we should be working on.”
ENGLT311
“Wrote 1 essay and other assignments were formal 750 word responses to prompts instead.”
ENGWR301

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She allows revisions and she wants you to succeed, but you must put in the work as well. She gives great feedback to ensure you get a good grade.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (6 online, 44 in , and workload themes. Credibility rating: High.

📝 Tough But

38/100

“She was a really tough grader; .”

❤️ Caring and Helpful

72/100

“One of the ! and understanding.”

👍

68/100

“As long as you show up and try, she'll help you pass.”

Theme 1

✍️ About Papers and Feedback

  • .
  • She .
  • She is .

Theme 2

📚 About Workload and Reading

  • Get ready to read.
  • and a one-page response paper about once a week.
  • If you are lazy & want to skate thru an .

Theme 3

❤️ About Care and Classroom Feel

  • She cares about her students and lot and their success.
  • She was willing to work with me, and she is there to help you when you need her.
  • We even had an end of the semester potluck.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

97

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

50 detailed reviews across many years, both formats, and consistent themes around care versus tough grading support a strong confidence rating.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 544
4 out of 520
3 out of 516
2 out of 57
1 out of 510

Course coverage

ENGWR3008 reviews
ENGWR3017 reviews
INDIS3135 reviews
ENGLT3214 reviews
ENGWR504 reviews
Show 14 more courses
ENGLT3203 reviews
ENGWR1013 reviews
ENG3202 reviews
ENG502 reviews
ENGLT3112 reviews
ENGWR512 reviews
AMLIT3211 review
ENG3211 review
ENGLA501 review
ENGRD3001 review
ENGW511 review
ENGWR1001 review
ENGWR591 review
ENWR1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

24 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 3 · A 11

B range

6

B+ 3 · B 3

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1