AI Rate Professor

English

Elizabeth Lore

ENGWR301 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Solid ENGWR301 choice if , and meet with her when stuck.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear rubricsGives good feedbackThree major papersCaring and accessibleParticipation matters
  • Writing class centered on three major papers plus many small 4-point assignments.
  • Students say if you follow rubrics and put in steady effort.
  • Office hours and ; one student wanted more how-to instruction.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

As and A+ reported with consistent work, but .

; online stresses solid effort.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Content is manageable but includes poetry analysis, comparison, and argumentative essays.

Similar standard writing load online and in person.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

as mandatory with in-class work emphasized.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Two of ; overall tone is positive with mild caveats.

third review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Rubrics are clear and present.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Three substantial papers plus frequent small assignments keep a steady writing load.

Format shift

Online and .

Teaching experience

Good

75/100

and ; one student wanted more process instruction.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment centers on papers and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

One strong in-person review , and a scaffolded three-paper final.

Main concern

Need to use office hours if behind.

What students said

“Professor Lore is great at explaining concepts and . Just follow the rubrics she gives.”
ENGWR301

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students , and fair results with solid effort.

Main concern

Limited how-to teaching; attendance and effort are required.

What students said

“If you put in a solid effort and get your work in you will be fine.”
ENGWR301
“she just tells you what to do, not rlly how to do it.”
ENGWR301

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

semester, not a traditional closed-book exam.

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

the semester with feedback opportunities.

Scaffolded three-paper finalRubric-based grading
“The final was 3 papers that we get a chance to work on and ask about throughout the entire semester.”
ENGWR301

Online

Online reviews describe three papers and many small 4-point assignments without traditional proctored exams.

Three papersSmall 4-point assignmentsNo traditional exam described
“There are three papers but .”
ENGWR301
“3 papers - one analyzing a poem, one analyzing smth else, and an argumentative essay comparing 2 books”
ENGWR301

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I really enjoyed this class. Professor Lore is great at explaining concepts and . Just follow the rubrics she gives.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews (2 online, 1 in-person), highlighting rubrics, papers, and effort. Credibility rating: Low.

📝

75/100

“ . Just follow the rubrics she gives.”

✍️ Paper-Centered Course

70/100

“There are three papers but .”

👍 Steady Effort Pays

72/100

“If you put in a solid effort and get your work in you will be fine.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • great at explaining concepts
  • Her style of curriculum helps to break down what she is teaching fully
  • she just tells you what to do, not rlly how to do it

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Just follow the rubrics she gives
  • If you put in a solid effort and get your work in you will be fine

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only three recent reviews from late 2024 to early 2025; consistent enough for direction but thin sample.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGWR3013 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1