AI Rate Professor

English

Caron Treon

ENGWR301 · ENGWR300 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
62.5%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you want a ; skip if you need dynamic teaching and deep English instruction.

Best fit · Easy A HunterCaring and flexibleLenient on deadlinesEssay-focusedMixed lecture engagementUnderstanding grader
  • Many students call her sweet, flexible with due dates, and open to redos.
  • Critics say lectures are boring or mostly independent study with little new English skill teaching.
  • Workload centers on a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Students report , and only a few major essays.

Both the online review and ; grade outcomes still range from A+ to F.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Writing tasks are described as not too hard, with .

Evidence is mostly in person; the single online review also calls the class easy and flexible.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

52/100

and urge showing up for assignment guidance; others mark it optional.

; in person is split between yes and no.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

About 63 percent would take again, with warm praise for care offset by complaints about weak teaching.

Online is strongly positive; in-person opinion is split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

Multiple , and not being a .

Format shift

Online also highlights flexible grading windows before work is scored.

Workload

Light

70/100

Usually a few major essays and limited textbook .

Format shift

Online tags mention many papers, but the narrative still frames the load as manageable.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Praised as caring and funny by some, criticized as boring or low-instruction by others.

Format shift

The online review is more positive about video .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

and papers with little emphasis on traditional exams.

Format shift

Same essay-heavy pattern online and in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In and not a and little learning beyond assignment prep.

Main concern

Engagement and teaching depth are inconsistent across reviews.

What students said

“She's super sweet and understanding. and always asks if need more time.”
ENGWR300
“Not a !!! I Would 100% percent take this class again.”
ENGWR300
“Feel like I learn barely anything in this class as most of the lectures are just focused on preparing for assignments.”
ENGWR300

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

One online review praises , and silly video lectures for ENGWR300.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“ and flexible with due dates. It was a if I haven't graded it yet you still have time to do it situation.”
ENGWR300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and little evidence of strict timed proctored exams.

Essay-based assessmentFlexible due datesRedos allowedNo clear proctored exams

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and assignment preparation, not high-stakes exams.

3 major essaysAssignment prep in classOpen topics
“we only written 3 major essay's, and .”
ENGWR300
“Also 3 to 4 essays with pretty open topic options.”
ENGWR301

Online

, and flexible due dates rather than proctored tests.

PapersFlexible due datesVideo lectures
“ and papers and his video lectures were always silly”
ENGWR300

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's super sweet and understanding. and always asks if need more time.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting care, essay load, and mixed teaching engagement. Credibility rating: Medium.

❤️ Care and Flexibility

80/100

“ and always announces that.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Overall a but just not a good teacher.”

📈

78/100

“Not a !!! I Would 100% percent take this class again.”

👍 Recommendation Split

58/100

“This class was fairly easy for me, the and she is always willing to help you if you are struggling.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She went on these long talks, and .
  • most of the lectures are just focused on preparing for assignments
  • his video lectures were always silly

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • and always asks if need more time.
  • Not a !!!
  • This class was really easy for me though

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • we only written 3 major essay's
  • So many papers
  • there

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only 8 recent reviews with mixed tone and , so confidence is moderate.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGWR3007 reviews
ENGWR3011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values