AI Rate Professor

English

E. Gutowsky

ENGLI100 · ENGWR100 · ENGLISH300 · ENGRW101 · ENG300 · ENGLWR300 · ENG100 · ENGWR300 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
88.89%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if and weekly reading—class is fun and you will learn to write.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHilarious lecturesMandatory attendancePop quizzes on readingsLots of writingFair with extra credit
  • Students love his energy, humor, and ability to make early English classes engaging.
  • Expect , and strict lateness rules.
  • Fair grading plus rewards students who show up prepared.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Papers and and proofreading, and helps, but sloppy MLA or skipped work hurts.

Nearly all grade-path evidence is in person; the one online review gave a C- without calling it easy.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Content is standard college writing with and .

In-person comments dominate; online only notes resource use without deep content critique.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

, and waiting outside if you arrive late.

Strict attendance comments are in person; the as not mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

and repeated praise for , and skill gains outweigh a few harsh older complaints.

Strong in-person endorsement; the lone online review is cooler and less conclusive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Called a fair grader with and if you follow prompts and MLA rules.

Format shift

In-person fairness theme is consistent; .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

, and pop quizzes add up without usually feeling overwhelming.

Format shift

Workload comments .

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

Students describe hilarious, high-energy lectures that keep early classes awake and improve writing.

Format shift

In-person teaching is the strength; online Canvas organization drew criticism.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

, and regular homework with occasional group work rather than one big exam focus.

Format shift

; online details are limited.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person classes are lively and joke-filled with , and frequent short papers; most students recommend him.

Main concern

Do not be late; attendance and .

What students said

“Professor Gutowsky is such a gem. I loved his lectures because he spoke about life events & asks for your input.”
ENGWR100
“To really receive a passing grade in this class you must show up every class period on time and ready.”
ENGLISH300

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and quality lower than the typical in-person praise.

Main concern

are posted.

What students said

“It is necessary to organize the .”
ENG300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and short papers with standard classroom rules rather than high-stakes locked exams.

Pop quizzes on readingsShort essaysExtra creditAttendance-linked grades

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person work centers on reading pop quizzes, short essays, and ; no Lockdown Browser mentions.

Pop quizzesShort papersExtra credit
“ .”
ENGWR300
“Lots of reading and your thoughts.”
ENG300

Online

The single online review does not clearly describe exam format beyond module-based lectures and assignments.

Module assignments
“He usually added the lectures and .”
ENG300

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Gutowsky is such a gem. I loved his lectures because he spoke about life events & asks for your input through your writing & class discussions.”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews (20 in person, 1 online), highlighting humor, attendance, and writing load. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Energy

86/100

“Every day of the class is fun and entertaining.”

👍 Recommendation

88/100

“He is definitely one of .”

⏰

18/100

“DONT be late or he will make you wait outside”

📝 Workload

55/100

“Lots of .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Hilarious
  • keeps you awake
  • always filled with a lot of energy
  • learns each and every student's name

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • as long as you follow the prompts
  • opportunities
  • Always proofread!!

Theme 3

⏰

  • Do NOT be late
  • show up every class period on time

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-one reviews from 2004-2024 show , and reading/writing load despite sparse grade detail.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 56
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGWR3006 reviews
ENG3005 reviews
ENGLWR3003 reviews
ENGLISH3002 reviews
ENGWR1002 reviews
Show 3 more courses
ENG1001 review
ENGLI1001 review
ENGRW1011 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1