Is this an easy A?
FairEffort
66/100Many As with and , but heavy weekly work and some tough-grader or AI-flag friction keep it from being free.
Online evidence stresses plus heavy modules; and structure complaints.
The decision
Key questions
Is this an easy A?
Many As with x x and x x, but heavy weekly work and some tough-grader or AI-flag friction keep it from being free.
Online evidence stresses x x plus heavy modules; x x x x x x x x and structure complaints.
Is the course easy?
Intro x x x x x, but x x x, and multi-chapter weeks keep content at a standard college load.
Both formats report reading-heavy modules; x x x x and occasional confusion.
Is attendance flexible?
Most reviews mark attendance mandatory and x x x x x x and passing.
x x x x x x x; online attendance is mixed and often not applicable.
Is this professor recommended?
Roughly 85% would take x x x x x, and x x despite workload and a few harsh outliers.
Online and x x x x; the sharpest avoid advice is recent and mostly in-person ECON302.
Course guide
Grading
Lenient
72/100
x x and clear criteria help many students, though tough-grader and AI-flag reports pull leniency down.
Format shift
Online students often call grading fair with x x; x x x x x x x x.
Workload
Heavy
38/100
Lots of x x x x, and papers are the dominant theme across years.
Format shift
Online modules are especially time-consuming; x x x x x and x x.
Teaching experience
Good
78/100
Students x x x x x, and real-world, with a minority calling structure confusing or harsh.
Format shift
x x x x and accessibility; recent negatives cluster more in in-person comments.
Assessment method
Balanced
48/100
Grades blend online homework, discussions, quizzes or multiple exams, papers, and a final.
Format shift
Online leans homework-quiz-essay; x x x x x x x.
Luni fit check
Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.
Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.
Course format
Classroom format
High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly
In-person students highlight engaging lectures, real-life examples, office hours, and x x x x x x x x AI enforcement and structure.
Main concern
x x and a few recent reports of AI accusations and x x.
What students said
“SO so so sweet, really trusts her students and made this class (I hate econ) really easy to follow along!!”
“x x x x. She has a big ego and will accuse you of using AI even if you didn't”
“if you never miss a class, x x x x x x x.”
Remote format
High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward
Online sections run on Waymaker/Connect/MindTap with heavy weekly reading, quizzes, essays on The Economist, and frequent x x; x x x x x.
Main concern
Paid online access plus long chapter work and x x x x.
What students said
“There is a lot of work, but if you submit all of it on time you should be fine.”
“The horrible thing is that the final was remotely proctored, as in we x x x x x x.”
“Lots of x x x x x.”
Exam style
quizzes and x x x x x x x as a safety net.
Assessment risk
Standard
55/100
Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.
In-person comments describe multiple exams, finals based on prior tests, and x x x x x x x.
“7 exams total including the final, but if you never miss a class, x x x x x x x.”
“Everything on final is based on all 6 exams”
x x x x x x x x, and some remotely proctored or recorded finals with no notes.
“Youll be recorded while x x. No notes or x x x.”
“The finals 10% and one try too. Lots of x x x x x.”
Student evidence
Top student voice
“Professor Camarena is AMAZING. Tough class no doubt, but she works so hard to give us everything we need to do well.”
“Cares greatly about her students, their wellbeing, and their learning.”
“x x x x x x x so x x!”
“She gives lots and lots of work though. expect x x x, and x x.”
“She has a big ego and will accuse you of using AI even if you didn't and will get you in trouble with your school.”
Theme 1
Theme 2
Theme 3
Data context
Analysis sample
50
Recent reviews read by the AI
62
Lifetime ratings
88/100
Evidence confidence
50 detailed reviews spanning 2014-2026 with strong theme consistency on care, x x, and heavy workload, plus some recent negative outliers.
Inside 50 stored ratings
Reported outcomes
38 reported outcomes
A+ 5 · A 17 · A- 2
B+ 1 · B 5 · B- 1
C 4
No reported values
No reported values
Not sure yet 3