AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

V. Alino

CHEM2A · WLD41 · CHEM1E · CHEM400L · CHEM400 · CHEM300 · CHEM305 · CHEMLAB305 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid unless and and delayed grades.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing LecturesTough GraderSlow GradingHeavy HomeworkSelf-Teach Required
  • Many students say and they had to teach themselves from the book.
  • , and high-stakes on finals or quizzes.
  • A minority found her helpful with office hours, , or doable summer sections.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Some As exist, but tough quizzes, heavily weighted finals, and .

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Students , and content that does not line up cleanly with exams.

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

and not in others, with no single consistent policy across reviews.

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

About 25% would take again, and most detailed comments urge students to pick someone else.

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

, and final-heavy grade swings dominate the comments.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Tons of , and frequent quizzes are common complaints.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Clarity and lecture quality are the .

Format shift

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Finals and easy assignments.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person chem and lab reviews , and slow grading, with occasional praise for help when students push for it.

Main concern

, and delayed grade posting that can block next-course enrollment.

What students said

“Lectures are long and boring. .”
CHEM305
“ ”
CHEM300
“she made it doable. !”
CHEM400

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are described as hard, misaligned with lectures, and decisive for the .

Hard QuizzesHeavily Weighted FinalPop QuizzesTough Tests

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students report , and tests covering material barely taught.

Hard QuizzesHeavily Weighted FinalPop QuizzesTough Tests
“ , so basically what you scored on that is what your grade will be.”
CHEM305
“She gives extremely hard quizzes in the a 20%”
CHEM1E

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Ms. Alino made it WAY more difficult mainly due to her TERRIBLE lecturing skills.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 in-person reviews with no online sample, , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Clarity

34/100

“Professor Alino does not know how to lecture.”

⚖️

30/100

“ , and she and tests.”

🚫 Low Recommendation

28/100

“ !”

📚 Self-Teaching Load

28/100

“Basically had to and I still got a D on the final.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Does not check emails, no way of getting contact of unless face to face
  • English was not her first language so sometimes it is a bit difficult to understand her

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She changed weight of grade AFTER the semester ended
  • Tons of homework

Theme 3

🧪

  • She doesnt really prepare you for lab practical
  • If you don't pay attention then you obviously won't pass

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

14 mostly older in-person reviews with consistent negative themes but modest sample size and limited recent coverage.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 56
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHEM3003 reviews
CHEM3053 reviews
CHEM1E2 reviews
3051 review
CHEM2A1 review
Show 4 more courses
CHEM4001 review
CHEM400L1 review
CHEMLAB3051 review
WLD411 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3