AI Rate Professor

English

Thomas Logan

ENGWR302 · ENGWR300 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
83.33%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Solid pick for online English if you will write on schedule and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear FeedbackFair but ToughEssay HeavyFew Major AssignmentsAccessible Outside Class
  • Mostly online composition classes with a few major essays and .
  • An A is realistic if you put in the work and hit deadlines; no late work and .
  • Older reviews flag unclear expectations; and manageable accelerated loads.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Students call it an easy A if you complete the and .

Almost all Easy A evidence is from Online reviews; the one In .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

Content is standard college composition with reading and , though accelerated terms feel busy.

Online students report manageable accelerated loads; the single In person review rated difficulty higher.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

88/100

Multiple Online reviews state attendance was not mandatory for the asynchronous writing courses.

Optional attendance evidence is Online-only; In .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

and fair grading, though some older reviews would not recommend.

Recommendation tone is stronger in recent Online reviews; In .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Clear criteria and fair marks for solid work, but and .

Format shift

Online and unclear criteria; In person calls him a .

Workload

Light

62/100

Often only a handful of major papers and summaries, though some report lots of homework and reading.

Format shift

Online accelerated terms still feel manageable; In person notes work is required without detailing volume.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

, and ; weaker older Online reviews cite vague instructions.

Format shift

; the single In person review is supportive.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and a few major papers rather than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One in-person ENGWR302 student found him a and a simple class layout.

Main concern

.

What students said

“He's a , but he gives excellent feedback to prepare you for the next assignment.”
ENGWR302

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online ENGWR courses revolve around a few major papers and summaries, with and .

Main concern

No late work and mixed clarity of expectations can tank grades if you miss the mark early.

What students said

“This is an easy A because you have to put in the work. But prof gives you plenty of .”
ENGWR300
“Only 7 assignments determine your grade. If you just try you'll probably get an A.”
ENGWR302
“Very fair and manageable workload. Great professor”
ENGWR300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is paper- and workshop-driven; reviews do not clearly describe traditional proctored exams.

Essay FocusedFew Graded ItemsPeer Workshops

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person .

Assignment Feedback
“he gives excellent feedback to prepare you for the next assignment.”
ENGWR302

Online

Online grades hinge on essays and a small set of .

Major PapersSummariesNo Late Work
“It was a 6 week course and we had 3 major papers and 3 summaries (due at same time). So four assignments.”
ENGWR300
“Only 7 assignments determine your grade.”
ENGWR302

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is an easy A because you have to put in the work. But prof gives you plenty of .”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews (10 Online, 1 In , and workload themes. Credibility rating: Medium.

📝 Writing-Centered Workload

62/100

“Very fair and manageable workload. Great professor”

🎯

72/100

“ and gives you tips.”

👍

76/100

“If you just try you'll probably get an A.”

⚠️ Clarity Can Slip

40/100

“ you have submitted your work.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and graded fairly quick.
  • and
  • Dr.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • This is an easy A because you have to put in the work.
  • He's a , but
  • .

Theme 3

❤️ About Accessibility

  • very easy to talk to and responded to my emails promptly.
  • if you need an .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews spanning 2014-2024 with solid detail, but older negatives and only one In person review reduce consistency.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGWR3007 reviews
ENGWR3024 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A 1

B range

4

B 4

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1