AI Rate Professor

Physics

Yuriko Jones

CHEM401 · PHYS430 · PHYSICS350 · PHYS350LAB · PHYSICS · PHYS350 · PHYSICS310 · 30 lifetime ratings

AI rating
77/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
88.89%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you will show up, study practice problems, and can handle blunt feedback for a fair physics grade.

Best fit · Effort For RewardWants you to passPractice-problem lecturesStrict sig figsDrops lowest scoresSometimes brusque
  • Exams mirror class practice problems and
  • and ; a recurring complaint is rude or condescending tone when students struggle
  • Physics workload is real, but structure and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

As and A+s are common when you study practice problems, but .

Online labs feel easier to ace; and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Physics content is real and summer pace is fast, yet class examples track exams closely.

; in-person lecture/lab is standard college physics difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and students say missing class loses exam-relevant practice.

; online notes weekly Zoom/lab expectations.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Nearly 89% would take again, praising fair structure and desire for students to pass despite tone issues.

Both online lab reviews recommend her; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Policy cushions help, but she is picky on significant figures, units, and neat written work.

Format shift

Online labs feel fair and clear; .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Weekly quizzes, labs, and exams keep you busy, though .

Format shift

Online weekly labs are lighter; .

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Clear walk-throughs and and brusque answers.

Format shift

Online comments are almost purely positive; in-person quality is high but more mixed on tone.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Quizzes, midterms/finals, and submission.

Format shift

; in-person physics is quiz and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

28 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person lecture and and support, while noting tough sig-fig grading and occasional rudeness.

Main concern

and a tone that scares some students from asking questions.

What students said

“ and and lab.”
PHYSICS350
“she gets rude I always hesitate to ask questions because of that.”
PHYS350
“ and .”
PHYS430

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online lab sections were simple, walk-through heavy, and and no exams.

Main concern

.

What students said

“ you through how to do each part/calculation.”
PHYS350LAB
“Super friendly, makes sure you understand the material, and will answer questions you have.”
CHEM401

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams track in-class practice and often allow aids or if you prepare.

Practice problems match examsCheat sheets allowedDrop lowest quiz/labReplace low exam with finalStrict significant figures

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and lecture examples, often with notecards/cheat sheets and .

Exam-like practice problemsCheat sheets/notecardsDrop lowest quiz and labReplace lowest exam with finalPicky sig figs
“ and and lab.”
PHYSICS350
“You get to use notecards on the exams and final. She replaces the if you improve on it.”
PHYS350

Online

Online lab reviews report walk-through labs, makeups, and .

No exams in lab sectionWeekly labsOne makeup lab
“Allows you to makeup one lab at the end of the semester and no exams.”
PHYS350LAB
“ and they are pretty straight forward, not hard to do.”
CHEM401

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Dr. Jones is very sweet and wants all her students to succeed. She does so many practice problems .”

Voice snapshots generated from 30 reviews, highlighting exam fairness, workload, and tone. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Alignment

78/100

“She does so many practice problems .”

👍 Recommendation Strength

88/100

“Best physics professors I've had at scc, wish she taught the whole sequence.”

⚖️

45/100

“She is a though she doesn't show it in her lectures”

😐 Classroom Tone

40/100

“Rlly rude to students, most were scared to speak up or ask questions”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The way she teaches is simple and she takes her time with the problems
  • shows you how to do the
  • lectures and

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and got an A in the class
  • and lab

Theme 3

❤️ About Support & Tone

  • She really wants students to pass and will answer any question you give her
  • she gets rude I always hesitate to ask questions
  • Super friendly, makes sure you understand the material

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

30

Recent reviews read by the AI

30

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty detailed reviews with a strong would-take-again signal and .

Inside 30 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 56
3 out of 55
2 out of 56
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHYS35017 reviews
PHYSICS3504 reviews
PHYS350LAB3 reviews
PHYSICS2 reviews
3501 review
Show 3 more courses
CHEM4011 review
PHYS4301 review
PHYSICS3101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 5 · A 6

B range

6

B+ 1 · B 5

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1