AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Trine Johansen

ANT310 · ANTH300 · ANTH331 · ANTH310 · 34 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
87.1%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take her for a well-taught anthropology course if , and put real effort into assignments.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and supportiveAmazing lecturesGives great feedbackTest heavyClear grading criteria
  • Students , and detailed feedback across ANTH courses.
  • Grades are attainable with notes and effort; open-note quizzes help online, but .
  • One recent ANTH310 lab review reports very heavy workload and a punitive feel; most .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many students earn As or A+s with notes, open-note quizzes, and , though she deducts for thin answers and .

Online reviews stress open-note quizzes and easy asynchronous work; but labs and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

, but biological anthropology needs memorization and some terms feel harder.

Online students more often call quizzes easy; and reading.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

52/100

; many in-person sections mark attendance mandatory with participation counting.

; in-person reviews more often say mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Roughly 87% would take again and most call her one of the .

Recommendation is strong in both formats; the sharpest avoid-language is one in-person ANTH310 lab review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Not a free A; she gives clear criteria and but commonly .

Format shift

Online students mention open-note help; .

Workload

Moderate

54/100

Weekly quizzes, discussions, and readings are usually manageable, but and 8-week terms feel heavy.

Format shift

Online workload is often quizzes and posts; one in-person lab review reports 10-plus hours weekly.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students repeatedly praise clear, funny, organized lectures and .

Format shift

Both formats rate teaching highly; a few older online and one lab review are outliers.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grades mix lecture-based exams and , and participation.

Format shift

Online leans quizzes and discussion posts; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and fair if you study, with mandatory participation common.

Main concern

ANTH310 lab can become very heavy and feel punitive if she suspects cheating; a few call her a .

What students said

“I honestly cannot say or feel enough for Professor Johansen. She's so supportive and understanding.”
ANTH300
“Johansen made the because she believed students had been cheating... The weekly lab takes at least 10 hours to complete.”
ANTH310
“Show up to class, PARTICIPATE, and do all the .”
ANTH310

Remote format

Online

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and , and manageable quizzes plus discussions.

Main concern

She expects detailed work and ; AI use is strictly discouraged and .

What students said

“Quizzes and lecture, and they are open note, so use that to your advantage!”
ANTH331
“Take this class!! Great material, great teacher who cares, who is on time and grades your work on time and fairly.”
ANTH300
“It's basically just a few quizzes and as long as you look over the slideshows.”
ANTH331

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams track lectures and readings; online quizzes are often open-note, while .

Open note online quizzesLecture-aligned testsTime-limited examsMultiple choice and short essayTest heavy in some sections

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and short essay based on lectures and readings; reviews do not clearly prove proctoring software.

Lecture-based examsMultiple choice and short essayReading-based quizzesTest heavy sections
“ but they are easy if you put in the work.”
ANTH300
“Participation is discussions will help your grade, which is otherwise based on a handful of and short essay questions.”
ANTH331

Online

and exams tied to lectures; timed tests can still feel tight.

Open noteLecture-aligned quizzesTimed examsDiscussion posts
“Quizzes and lecture, and they are open note, so use that to your advantage!”
ANTH331
“ limit.”
ANTH331

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Genuinely one of the . and the work that she gives relates well to the topics that we are learning.”

Voice snapshots generated from 35 reviews (17 online, 18 in , and workload themes. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“Actually one of the as a student. Although her class is lecture heavy, it is still easy to keep attentive and she makes them interesting.”

👍 Recommendation

88/100

“I would take her over and over. She is the best professor for .”

❤️

90/100

“She's so supportive and understanding. I am very appreciative of her consideration.”

📝

58/100

“ and up to her criteria, there's always room for expansion on every assignment nothing is good enough for her.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The lectures were always informative and entertaining.
  • Her lectures and powerpoints do a really good job of explaining the information.
  • She made the class fun even though it was an 8AM lecture.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Show up to class, PARTICIPATE, and do all the .
  • and her lectures are actually pretty funny.
  • The weekly lab takes at least 10 hours to complete, in addition to the weekly participation.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • and caring and .
  • Very caring for her students and .
  • She's always there for you and very approachable.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

35

Recent reviews read by the AI

34

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

35 detailed reviews spanning 2015-2026 with consistent praise for teaching and and format coverage.

Inside 35 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 526
4 out of 56
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ANTH30015 reviews
ANTH31011 reviews
ANTH3317 reviews
ANT3102 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

30 reported outcomes

A range

21

A+ 8 · A 12 · A- 1

B range

5

B+ 3 · B 2

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2