AI Rate Professor

Math Statisitics

Reena Mathur

MATH335 · MATH28 · MATH342 · MATH25 · STAT300 · MATH34 · MATH120 · STAT100 · MATH100 · MATH45 · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
54.55%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Skip if you need clear lecturing and responsive help; only consider if and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing TeachingUnorganizedAttendance CriticalExtra Credit PossibleLanguage Barrier
  • Recent and online reviews are strongly negative on organization, lecturing, and support.
  • Older in-person math sections sometimes report easy As if , and use study guides.
  • low-value to many students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some sections call it an easy A with attendance and study guides, but , and recent drops keep the A from feeling free.

Online reviews emphasize harsh or ; easier-A comments .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Content is standard college math/stats but often feels harder because and students must self-teach.

Both formats report high difficulty; online adds disorganization rather than easier content.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and warn that missing class means missing test material.

; online notes mixed mandatory flags with little live teaching value.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

, but recent comments and online experiences push many students toward avoidance.

Recommendation is much weaker online than in older in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Some mention and fair criteria, while others report tough grading and .

Format shift

Online comments sound harsher on .

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Homework load varies by course; some report little homework while others tag lots of homework and .

Format shift

Online MATH100 cites heavy assignments; several in-person sections report light or packet-based work.

Teaching experience

Average

46/100

Students split between caring and , and irritated by questions.

Format shift

In-person is mixed over years; the two online reviews are strongly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Tests, quizzes, and ; and sometimes minimal.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize exams; as PDFs.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and passable exams from notes, while many report poor explanations, irritation at questions, and self-teaching.

Main concern

Lecture quality and attitude are inconsistent; skipping class is repeatedly framed as failing.

What students said

“Easy A class, but you need to attend the and practice the problems she gave.”
MATH45
“Do NOT I REPEAT DO NOT take this professor she will expect that you know ALL concepts and during class so its pointless to show up”
STAT300
“I do not have a single set of .”
MATH342

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections are described as unorganized with little to , slow or , and sudden schedule changes.

Main concern

, and inaccessible communication make online sections high-risk.

What students said

“Never posted a syllabus. . Inaccessible other than email, and .”
MATH100
“ and she doesn’t lecture. ... Do not recommend this course with this professor.”
STAT100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are central and often tied to lecture notes or study guides, with mixed clarity and little student-friendly open-book evidence.

Study-guide based testsExtra credit on testsTest heavyHandwritten exam uploads online

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person tests often come from lectures or study guides; some call them easy with .

Lecture-based testsExtra credit on testsPop quizzes in some courses
“Tests and if you do the study guides. There's usually on the tests.”
MATH342
“ ”
STAT100

Online

and handwritten paper exams uploaded as PDFs; lecture support is minimal.

Handwritten exam PDFsSchedule changes without noticeTest heavy
“Assignments and final. Exams were only accepted as hand written paper problems uploaded as pdf.”
MATH100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Pleaseee save yourself the trouble, I would ask questions during class and would just get told to write things down and she never actually helped me.”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews (2 online, 20 in person), highlighting polarized teaching quality and format risk. Credibility rating: High.

📉 Teaching Clarity

46/100

“she does not teach math she puts math on the board and expects you to know how to do it”

👍 Recommendation Split

42/100

“Definitely a hard class, but if youre not lazy and need this class to graduate, it is definitely possible!”

⚠️ Online Risk

20/100

“I’m currently taking her stat100 course and it has been the had.”

📝

28/100

“ , and pay attention and you'll pass.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • during class so its pointless to show up
  • She really cares and strives to make sure that you understand the lesson
  • She gets very irritated when someone ask questions

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A class, but you need to attend the classes
  • all tests and

Theme 3

❤️ About Support & Attitude

  • Responded sarcastically after informed of my dyslexia
  • Professor Mathur was very kind and helpful
  • She almost seemed annoyed that we didn't understand something

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

22 reviews span 2017-2026 with detailed conflicting experiences; sample is solid though polarized by era and format.

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 58

Course coverage

MATH1005 reviews
MATH3353 reviews
MATH343 reviews
MATH3423 reviews
STAT1003 reviews
Show 5 more courses
MATH1201 review
MATH251 review
MATH281 review
MATH451 review
STAT3001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 6

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 3

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 3