AI Rate Professor

English

Jodi Angel

ENGWR101 · ENGWR51 · ENGWR302 · ENG302 · ENGWR301 · ENGLT321 · ENGWR300 · 33 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
92.31%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you want to actually become a better writer and reader; not a free Easy A.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHilarious lecturesWriting growth coachReading-heavyTough but fair essaysMust-take English
  • Near-unanimous praise for engaging, funny, and transformative English teaching
  • Expect , and fair but
  • ; and revise

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Passing and drafting, but many stress it is not an easy A and .

Almost all evidence is in person; two online notes still expect real work with time to finish.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is college writing and literature with and .

; online sample is too small to diverge clearly.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

Many in-person sections require attendance; least one report.

; in-person more often requires showing up.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

93/100

and say she permanently improved their writing.

Recommendation is near-universal in person; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Clear criteria and , but and a few call her a tough grader.

Format shift

In-person comments range from fair to tough; online sample is small and positive.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Multiple essays, novel reading, quizzes, and , though work is usually well spaced.

Format shift

Workload detail .

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Hilarious, engaging lectures and mentoring that transform analytical reading and college writing.

Format shift

; online still rates quality 5 with good support.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Mix of , and sometimes a final.

Format shift

, and final; online mentions general work without full exam detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

31 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students overwhelmingly call her one of the : , and life-changing for writing skills.

Main concern

Lots of reading, quizzes, and .

What students said

“ !!!! Sad I wont be having her for 302.”
ENGWR300
“ ! . AT SCC.”
ENGWR301
“It is not an easy A but I worked hard and manage with an A- by the end”
ENGWR300

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Limited online feedback still rates her supportive with good comments, manageable timelines, and .

Main concern

Only two online reviews; do work ahead and ask questions early.

What students said

“ and .”
ENGWR300
“Everything was really easy and they replied to emails in a timely manor a ”
ENGLT321

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Expect a reading-based midterm, several essays, quizzes, and a .

In-class midtermEssays and research paperReading quizzesFinal sometimes waived for attendance

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person sections report novel-based midterms, multiple essays, quizzes, and a .

In-class midtermReading quizzesResearch paper or portfolio finalAttendance-linked final exemption
“1 novel, 4 papers, midterm based off novel its easy. because I attended every class.”
ENGWR300
“Had an 4 essays, an in class midterm, and a as the final.”
ENGWR300

Online

Online reviews ; work is mainly assignments with time to finish.

Assignment-based online work
“The work was a bit difficult at times, but she gave plenty of time to finish, so there is no excuse.”
ENGWR300

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Angel is the . She is engaging, hilarious, and knows her subject.”

Voice snapshots generated from 33 reviews (2 online, 31 in person), emphasizing teaching excellence and fair challenge. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“By far the .”

😂 Hilarious Class Energy

90/100

“Super hilarious, easy going, and straightforward.”

✍️ Writing Transformation

92/100

“It is thanks to Prof Angel that my writing has improved tremendously.”

⚖️ Not an Easy A

58/100

“It is not an easy A but I worked hard and manage with an A- by the end”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Hilarious and engaging lectures
  • and
  • Passionate published-author energy without ego

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of reading and quizzes
  • but fair if you draft
  • Do the work and you will pass

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Caring and genuine
  • Wants students to maximize potential

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

33

Recent reviews read by the AI

33

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

33 reviews with extremely consistent praise for teaching quality; online sample is tiny (2) so format-specific online claims stay cautious.

Inside 33 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 530
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGWR30015 reviews
ENGWR3018 reviews
3012 reviews
ENGLT3212 reviews
ENGWR1012 reviews
Show 3 more courses
ENGWR512 reviews
ENG3021 review
ENGWR3021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 1 · A 10 · A- 3

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values