AI Rate Professor

English

Robert Gmelin

ENG300 · 0001A · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Consider him for in-person classes if you want engaging lectures, but be cautious online and do not expect an easy A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHilarious In PersonTough GraderGives Good FeedbackPolarizing OnlineHard To Earn A
  • , and lectures
  • Online and hybrid reviews flag arrogance, demeaning comments, and hard A grading
  • Participation and imagination still may not protect you from tough marks

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

40/100

Students report B and B+ grades and hear early that an A is very hard despite participation.

Online reviews stress hard A ; but not described as free As.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

Difficulty ratings and comments suggest moderate intellectual challenge with more style than content pain.

In-person difficulty looks lower; online hybrid feels harder and more stressful.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

, while others say it is not required.

Online hybrid notes cancelled sessions and Zoom talk; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

, but one recent online review is a strong character-based warning.

In-person recommendations are enthusiastic; online recommendations are cautious or negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

and hard-to-earn A comments show picky, selective grading.

Format shift

Online students feel marks do not match effort; .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Workload centers on discussions, participation, and writing rather than endless busywork.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize participation and .

Teaching experience

Good

62/100

In-person lectures are fun and helpful, but online sessions can feel rant-heavy and demeaning.

Format shift

In-person teaching is highly praised; online hybrid teaching draws serious criticism.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Participation, discussions, and a few graded items drive the .

Format shift

Online mentions discussion marks and few graded things; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews call him awesome, hilarious, and .

Main concern

Sample size is small, so the glowing tone may not cover every section.

What students said

“Best Teacher ! Took .”
ENG300
“He is awesome, gives great feedback, makes class fun with interactive lectures, and .”
0001A

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online and hybrid experiences are mixed to negative, with and personality complaints.

Main concern

Demeaning rants and hard-to-earn A grades can sour the online experience.

What students said

“Very self-absorbed, arrogant, sexist, and demeaning.”
ENG300
“He also mentioned on the 1st day that it's very hard to get an A in his course which I don't think is necessary.”
ENG300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe classic proctored exams and instead stress discussions, participation, and .

Participation HeavyFew Graded ItemsZoom DiscussionsWriting Feedback

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

exam policy and instead highlight interactive lectures and feedback.

Interactive LecturesStrong Feedback
“makes class fun with interactive lectures, and .”
0001A
“Best Teacher ! Took .”
ENG300

Online

Online evidence focuses on Zoom talk, discussion participation, and subjective .

Zoom MeetingsDiscussion ParticipationTough Subjective Grading
“He talks a lot in his zoom meetings.Thankfully, they were recorded.”
ENG300
“He takes off marks that don't make sense even when you participate in discussions.”
ENG300

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Best Teacher ! Took .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, contrasting glowing in-person praise with online concerns. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎭 Hilarious In Person

90/100

“He is awesome, gives great feedback, makes class fun with interactive lectures, and .”

🧊 Online Personality Risk

20/100

“Very self-absorbed, arrogant, sexist, and demeaning.”

🎯 Hard To Earn An A

40/100

“He also mentioned on the 1st day that it's very hard to get an A in his course which I don't think is necessary.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • makes class fun with interactive lectures
  • He talks a lot in his zoom meetings
  • 3-hour classes were full of unrelated rants

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • it's very hard to get an A in his course
  • use your imagination, no wrong or right answers but would still give you a B

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Hilarious
  • arrogant, sexist, and demeaning
  • extremely helpful

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Four reviews give useful contrast by format but remain a small, somewhat polarized sample.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG3003 reviews
0001A1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values