AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Systems

Joseph Cheung

CISN341 · CISS316 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.7

The decision

Avoid Joseph Cheung; reviews describe chaotic pacing, insane workload, and unfair deadline changes.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerWorkload DisasterUnfair DeadlinesCanvas ChaosTest HeavyAvoid
  • All three reviews rate quality 1 with .
  • He shortens courses, moves due dates late, and .
  • Even students who can earn A+ call the and perfect-score rules unmanageable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Even an A+ student said perfection was required or assignments score zero, and others dropped under the compressed load.

Online and in-person both describe extreme rules and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

Content is not described as intellectually advanced, but the compressed volume and pacing make the course feel brutal.

Both formats center on workload and schedule chaos rather than deep theory difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

and the course structure demands daily posts and constant module work.

Evidence mainly ; in-person attendance not clearly detailed.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

No student recommends him; comments say , and .

Both formats are uniformly negative with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

and a 100-or-zero assignment policy leave little room for partial credit.

Format shift

Online review explicitly says less than 100% becomes a zero; .

Workload

Overwhelming

5/100

Students report two discussion posts daily, many modules, many assignments, and .

Format shift

Online and and insane daily work.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Reviews focus on chaos as a substitute, ignored course structure, and .

Format shift

Online substitute story is especially negative; and compression.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Test-heavy with frequent exams plus constant assignments and .

Format shift

Both formats mention early-closed exams and heavy .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The in-person review says an 8-week class became 5 weeks with , and .

Main concern

Insane compressed workload and .

What students said

“The workload is insane and . Dont.”
CISS316

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online students report a substitute-driven disaster or a crammed short course with , and zero-tolerance scoring.

Main concern

, and impossible compressed assignment load.

What students said

“This professor was a disaster. He changed due dates 2 days before the new due date. .”
CISN341
“It was more like 5-weeks he shortened the class and crammed 4 Chapters into one along with 16 assign.”
CISS316

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and the term is shortened, creating a high-pressure strict experience.

Exams Closed EarlyTest HeavyCompressed ScheduleNo Clear Notice

Assessment risk

Strict

20/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and two exams a week in a compressed five-week shell of an eight-week course.

Exams Closed EarlyTwo Exams a WeekCompressed Term
“It ended up being 5 weeks because he closed all the .”
CISS316

Online

and due dates moved with little or no email notice.

Closed Exams EarlySudden Due Date ChangesTest Heavy
“He changed due dates 2 days before the new due date. .”
CISN341
“It was more like 5-weeks he shortened the class and crammed 4 Chapters into one along with 16 assign.”
CISS316

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This professor was a disaster. He changed due dates 2 days before the new due date. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 consistently negative reviews on chaos, workload, and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“This professor came in as a substitute when our great professor had an emergency. This professor was a disaster.”

📚 Workload Overload

5/100

“The workload is insane and . Dont.”

🚫 Recommendation

5/100

“Good Luck!”

⏰ Unfair Deadlines

15/100

“he closed all the .”

Theme 1

⚠️ About Course Chaos

  • He changed due dates 2 days before the new due date.
  • he closed all the .
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • he wants you to get 100% in everything if you don't you will get a 0 for the assign.
  • I had an A+ in his class it isn't hard but he gave too much hw
  • It was too much of a workload for .

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • crammed 4 Chapters into one along with 16 assign.
  • there are
  • if you want to even get through the course.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only three uniformly negative reviews give a but limited sample size and time span keep credibility low to medium-low.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CISS3162 reviews
CISN3411 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1