AI Rate Professor

English

Guy Stimers

ENGWR300 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you stay on top of multi-week papers and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear feedbackWriting-heavyCaringStay on deadlinesEngaging and funny
  • , and would take him again for ENGWR300.
  • ; missing one can fail you.
  • One recent review calls him a , so effort still matters.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

As are common when you complete every writing assignment and , but and a C appear if you lag.

; online reviews split between fair and tough.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content is manageable college writing with reading, but .

Online comments stress volume more than the single in-person review.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews split between optional and .

Online reports both No and Yes; in-person was mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

Four of five quality ratings are 5 with .

Online is mostly positive with one dissent; in-person is strongly positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Many say standards are reasonable with ; one calls him a .

Format shift

; in-person feels more lenient.

Workload

Heavy

38/100

Five major writing .

Format shift

Workload pressure is mainly from online reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

, and accessibility dominate despite one frustrated review.

Format shift

Strong across formats; sole low score is online.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Writing assignments carry most weight; miss one and you can fail.

Format shift

Assignment focus is clearest online; in-person also centers writing.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

and engaging; show up, try hard, and you get an A while improving writing.

Main concern

.

What students said

“If you show up to class and .”
ENGWR300

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online and care but warn writing load piles up if you fall behind; and weird.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“ and his standards of work aren't super high, unless you prove to be good at first.”
ENGWR300
“you will fail the class if you miss any one of them.”
ENGWR300
“Professor Stimers was such a , and so weird and hard to understand.”
ENGWR300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is multi-week writing assignments with peer and .

Writing assignmentsPeer reviewPaper-focused assessment

Assessment risk

Standard

70/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

challenging but completable; no formal exam policy is stated.

Writing assignmentsParticipation matters
“ , but easy to complete.”
ENGWR300

Online

Online sections , and instructor comments; no webcam or Lockdown Browser is mentioned.

5 writing assignmentsPeer reviewFail if miss a WA
“Professor Stimers ENGWR 300 class requires 5 writing assignments (WAs), and you will fail the class if you miss any one of them.”
ENGWR300
“I find the peer review comments and Professor Stimers comments enormously helpful to improve my drafts.”
ENGWR300

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you show up to class and . His class will also prepare you for any other writing assignments you may have in school.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting feedback strengths and writing-load risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

✍️

85/100

“ and his standards of work aren't super high, unless you prove to be good at first.”

📚 Writing Load

38/100

“you will fail the class if you miss any one of them. They carry most of the weights in the class.”

👍 Recommendation

80/100

“10/10 would take this class again.”

⚖️

58/100

“Professor Stimers was such a , and so weird and hard to understand.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he was engaging
  • Left comments asking how

Theme 2

📈 About Workload and Grades

  • stay on top of it or it becomes way too much to handle
  • The if you put enough time into it
  • This was by far the hardest English class I had ever taken

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • it felt like he really cared
  • Caring
  • Accessible outside class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed recent reviews are mostly aligned but one strong negative and .

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGWR3005 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1