AI Rate Professor

English

Sara Anderson

ENG300 · ENGW300 · ENGWR100 · ENGWR300 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid if and ; pick another English professor.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear expectationsTough picky graderLittle teaching helpUnorganized lessonsSelf-taught feeling
  • Students say they taught themselves and .
  • as picky on minor mistakes with .
  • .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

and weak guidance make a strong grade hard even when content difficulty varies.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

, and little usable instruction rather than simple writing practice.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

At and participation as important, with no evidence of flexible policy.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Every review is low quality and students .

Recommendation evidence is entirely in person; online sample is empty.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students report and grades that hurt GPA enough to force a retake.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Group work, essays, reading, and presentations appear, but the main pain is clarity not sheer volume.

Format shift

Workload comments are all in person.

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

, and weak at improving writing skills.

Format shift

Teaching complaints .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

38/100

Assessment centers on essays, group presentations, and writing work with .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

All six reviews are in person and consistently negative on clarity, organization, and useful writing growth.

Main concern

and little .

What students said

“I . In fact, I mostly taught myself.”
ENGWR100
“I did not learn anything in her class. At the end of the semester I was more confuse and lost than ever!”
ENGWR100
“Unorganize professor who very picky and don't teach much to improve ur english writing.”
ENGW300

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

One student sat a ; exam policy is otherwise sparsely described.

Midterm mentionedEssay-based workLimited feedback before exams

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments mention a midterm taken without prior graded guidance, .

Midterm with little prior feedbackEssay grading
“ how i should improve off essays.”
ENGWR100

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I did not learn anything in her class. At the end of the semester I was more confuse and lost than ever!”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person English reviews with consistent negative themes; credibility Medium due to small sample.

🚫 Teaching Quality

20/100

“I mostly taught myself.”

📉 Recommendation

12/100

“ if possible.”

✂️

22/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Unorganize professor who very picky and don't teach much
  • .
  • she treated us like babies.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • she gave me a grade that affected my GPA that
  • I felt extreme disconnect and disrespect.

Theme 3

📚 About Course Content

  • this is more like a creative writing, feel like a tree, move like a tree art class
  • uses a horrible textbook.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Six uniformly negative in-person reviews over several years are consistent but the small sample and sparse grade data keep credibility only medium.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 54
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENGWR1003 reviews
ENG3001 review
ENGW3001 review
ENGWR3001 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values