AI Rate Professor

Communication

Nancy Caselli

COMM331 · COMS331 · GRDSC0000 · COMM301 · COMMS301 · COMM321 · COMS361 · MATH12017125 · COM300 · COM301 · 62 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

older in-person classes can work if you show up and grind, but if and fair grading.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough GraderGroup Projects HeavyUnclear InstructionsPolarizingLecture Heavy
  • Recent , and rude interactions.
  • for confidence building.
  • Attendance is effectively mandatory and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Students say you must use exact wording, grind textbook examples, and .

; in-person reviews also call it not an easy A.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is approachable for communication courses but and .

Online students ; in-person focuses more on textbook volume.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and missing class costs notes and .

; lectures often unrecorded.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

40/100

About two in five would take her again; praise clusters in older in-person classes while .

; in-person evidence is mixed across eras.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

and students report docking for tiny errors and personal-example mismatch.

Format shift

Online comments .

Workload

Moderate

46/100

Group projects, reading logs, and multiple speeches or .

Format shift

; in-person stresses speeches and textbook prep.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Knowledgeable and sometimes caring lecturer, but recent comments also describe rudeness, favoritism, and .

Format shift

In-person older reviews are warmer; online reviews are sharply negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Speeches, group projects, discussions, and .

Format shift

Online midterms are short-answer heavy; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

41 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

many older students praise caring lectures and public-speaking growth, while , and .

Main concern

, and group-project dependence.

What students said

“She is a strong women. She carries herself very well. Working with other students was the challenge, but she is amazing.”
COMM301
“Wow. What an amazing professor. She is so knowledgeable. Always made room for discussion with students. Not an easy A. However, IT IS DOABLE.”
COMM331
“Do not take this professor. off rude vibes.”
COMM331

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report harsh short-answer , and unsupportive tone.

Main concern

punitive.

What students said

“Caselli makes this class far more difficult than it needs to be. , and students are penalized harshly.”
COM300
“Do not take this professor!!! proceeds to mark you down for not completely all aspects of the assignment.”
COMM331
“You will most likely fail unless you use the exact language she is looking for.”
COMM301

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and personal examples that match her expectations.

Short AnswerTextbook VocabularyIn-Depth ExamplesStudy Guides Sometimes

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and often come with study guides if you attend and read.

Textbook BasedHard MidtermsStudy Guides
“The lecture what is in the book) and you should definitely study.”
COMM331
“ are from the book.”
COMM331

Online

Online students describe harsh short-answer midterms needing exact language and .

Short AnswerHarsh GradingExact Language Expected
“ having to provide a lot of examples.”
COM301
“The . You will most likely fail unless you use the exact language she is looking for.”
COMM301

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Not an easy A. However, IT IS DOABLE. You just have to put the work in.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting polarized teaching and . Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

28/100

“ do wrong. Doesn't have clear instructions which makes it hard.”

🎯 Teaching Split

55/100

“ , and . I have learned so much from her.”

👎 Online Warning

25/100

“ . She seems to be a good professor in person, but doesn't understand online challenges.”

📌

18/100

“Lectures will not be recorded which sucks if you have a valid reason not to make it, then you are pretty much on your own.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's funny and caring and .
  • Her lectures are pretty entertaining and she makes the content relatable.
  • She likes to cut off her students.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Not an easy A. However, IT IS DOABLE.
  • things unnecessarily difficult.
  • You have to work for an A but she definitely wants you to succeed.

Theme 3

👥

  • You're screwed if you're in a and everyone else doesn't do a good job.
  • Make sure you show up and don't let your group down.
  • 3 group projects. If you have bad groups, you will receive a bad grade.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

62

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews spanning many years with detailed comments and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 530
4 out of 510
3 out of 56
2 out of 55
1 out of 511

Course coverage

COMM30119 reviews
COMM33118 reviews
COM3002 reviews
COM3012 reviews
COMMS3012 reviews
Show 6 more courses
COMS3312 reviews
3011 review
COMM3211 review
COMS3611 review
GRDSC00001 review
MATH120171251 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

22 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 4 · A- 2

B range

9

B+ 4 · B 4 · B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Not sure yet 3 · Not_Sure_Yet 1 · Rather not say 1