AI Rate Professor

Art

Ianna Frisby

ART320 · ART105 · ART390 · ART370 · ARTH300 · ART430 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
71.43%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you want serious studio rigor and can handle tough, non-coddling critiques.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough critiquesNot beginner-friendlyPassionate artistHarsh gradingBlunt feedback
  • Strong craft and ceramics knowledge, but critiques are blunt and often feel demeaning.
  • Beginners report unfair or ; intermediate students fare better.
  • Attendance and participation matter, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

As are possible, but , and taste-driven critiques make an easy A unlikely.

All evidence is in person.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Studio work is fun yet challenging, with history content, readings, and demanding craft expectations.

Course challenge comments are entirely from in-person art courses.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and stress participation and presence.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

; often avoided by beginners seeking validation.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

and unfair-critique comments outweigh occasional extra-credit safety nets.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Projects, lab work, readings, critiques, and .

Format shift

Workload details are all in person.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Passionate and knowledgeable for many, but blunt, biased, or demeaning delivery hurts the overall experience.

Format shift

Teaching and art history courses.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and participation more than traditional exams.

Format shift

Assessment pattern is documented only in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person studio and art history reviews split between passionate praise and and rude delivery.

Main concern

Beginners and sensitive students may feel judged or unfairly graded on taste.

What students said

“she is definitely not the most beginner-friendly.”
ART390
“she grades unfairly and will grade you down if your work is not interesting enough for her”
ART390
“She's tough with her critiques but , and helpful.”
ART320

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Studio courses center on project critiques, while and .

Project critiquesImage quizzes and testsExtra credit availableParticipation graded

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests on slides or images.

Project-based gradingCritique heavyImage quizzesExtra credit
“she grades unfairly and will grade you down if your work is not interesting enough for her even if you meet all the criteria.”
ART390
“ lectures plus some from an image database.”
ARTH300

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“she is definitely not the most beginner-friendly.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 in-person reviews, highlighting passion, harsh critiques, and beginner risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎨 Passionate Craft Teaching

70/100

“Ianna is a wonderful professor & artist. She is clearly incredibly passionate about her work & eager to share her knowledge.”

🪓 Tough Critiques

32/100

“prepare for her demeaning attitude.”

🧭 Depends on Student Level

55/100

“She is more suited for intermediate or advanced students.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's tough with her critiques but , and helpful.
  • she was kinda of rude and mean.
  • Very passionate about all kinds of art.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • she grades unfairly and will grade you down if your work is not interesting enough for her
  • She's a , so if you know only little .
  • Gives a lot of so it makes it hard to fail the class.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Fairness & Tone

  • Shes picks her favorites and it extremely rude/blunt to others.
  • If your work doesn't suit her taste, then she'll be very judgy and demeaning towards it.
  • her highly unpleasant personality really makes that impossible.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

16 reviews are detailed and recent enough to show a and fairness complaints.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 56
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ART3905 reviews
ART3204 reviews
ARTH3004 reviews
ART1051 review
ART3701 review
Show 1 more courses
ART4301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 4 · A- 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1