AI Rate Professor

English

Ann Michaels

ENG59 · ENG100 · ENGWR100 · ENGWR300 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Take her if and steady writing deadlines; skip if you need a .

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough LoveBluntHelpfulPaper HeavyMandatory Attendance
  • Older reviews often praise her as funny, helpful, and a strong writing teacher.
  • The newest review calls her rude and aggressive with and many papers.
  • Success depends on showing up, meeting deadlines, and staying on top of writing work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Students can pass by doing summaries and turning work in on time, but she expects a lot and .

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

, though she expects consistency and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Comments say and you need to show up and turn work in to do well.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

64/100

Most older students recommend her teaching, but the newest review is strongly negative and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Some say you pass if work is on time; the recent review and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Expect regular summaries, papers, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

Many students call her funny, clear, and critique.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment centers on papers, summaries, and writing tasks more than formal exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

mentorship to one recent report of rudeness and heavy paper load.

Main concern

Recent tone and intro writing course.

What students said

“She is extremely rude and aggressive.”
ENG100
“Ann Michaels was the .”
ENGWR300
“SHOW UP, SHUT UP, AND TURN IN YOUR ASSIGNMENTS AND YOU WILL DO GOOD.”
ENG100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize papers and timed writing work more than proctored exams.

Paper FocusedSummariesAssignment Deadlines

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and turning work in on time rather than exam software.

So Many PapersSummariesTurn Work In On Time
“Lots of homework, So many papers”
ENG100
“just do all your summaries and turn in your work on time...ur sure to pass”
ENGWR100

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“SHOW UP, SHUT UP, AND TURN IN YOUR ASSIGNMENTS AND YOU WILL DO GOOD. PROFF. MICHAELS TEACHES WITH TOUGH LOVE, BUT YOU GOTTA LOVE HER.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 in-person reviews with mixed depth and older dates. Credibility rating: Medium.

📚 Teaching Style

70/100

“Ann Michaels was the .”

📝 Workload Reality

48/100

“She is extremely rude and aggressive.”

👍 Recommendation Split

64/100

“ .”

⏰ Attendance and Deadlines

22/100

“ but overall she is great”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • VERY BLUNT AND TO THE POINT
  • teaches you how to create your own style in writing

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • you really do have to be on top of your work
  • just do all your summaries and turn in your work on time

Theme 3

⚠️ About Tone Concerns

  • She is extremely rude and aggressive.
  • TEACHES WITH TOUGH LOVE

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only 9 mostly older reviews, several appearance-focused and light on academics, with one recent strong negative.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGWR1005 reviews
ENG1002 reviews
ENG591 review
ENGWR3001 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values