AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Annette Deglow

MATH1034 · MATH304 · MATH103 · MATH187 · GEOMETRY · MATH103104 · MATH110 · MATH100 · MATH104 · 37 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
10%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless she is your only option and you already handle fast-paced, high-structure math well.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerRushes lecturesBinder policeFinal is everythingTough graderSkip class you fail
  • Most students describe rushed, and poor online facilitation.
  • , and often hinges on the .
  • A minority praise her system if you already learn well and follow every rule.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

; even strong homework can still tank the grade.

Online and and ; online adds tech and pace complaints.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Content moves very fast with and tests, so weaker math students struggle badly.

Both formats call the pace a speed run; online comments emphasize multi-hour rushed lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Attendance is repeatedly described as .

Online and ; online still demands long live lecture time.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

Would-take-again is near 10 percent and most recent comments urge students to find anyone else.

Online reviews are almost uniformly negative; in-person has a few older defenders mixed with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

, and final-heavy rules dominate student reports.

Format shift

; online adds complaints about opaque Canvas scoring.

Workload

Overwhelming

22/100

Lots of , and frequent high-stakes tests.

Format shift

Workload is heavy in both formats; online adds long lecture blocks and heavy testing.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

A few students like her system, but most describe rushed, rude, or .

Format shift

Online teaching is especially criticized; but still leans negative overall.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Homework and binders matter, yet many say the .

Format shift

Both formats stress tests and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

31 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews mostly criticize speed, organization, notebook rules, and who say her rigid system builds real algebra skills.

Main concern

Mandatory attendance, binder rules, and students.

What students said

“ . Goes super fast when teaching”
MATH104
“ and confusing. ... if you didn't pass the .”
MATH103104
“Those who cannot listen will not pass. ... and has a proven system for you to LEARN ALGEBRA”
MATH103

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections are widely described as and , and little helpful interaction.

Main concern

Fast pace, technology struggles, and .

What students said

“she talks so much does not engage with students the test and ”
MATH100
“Deglow did not allow us to ask questions during her 3-hour lectures.”
MATH103
“She has no idea how to use the Canvas technology. She flies through lecture and the students have to correct her answers.”
MATH104

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments are high-stakes and unforgiving, with finals and rigid method requirements driving risk.

Test heavyFinal decides gradeHard timed examsNo flexible makeup cultureGraphing-heavy finals

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as hard, comprehensive, and sometimes final-gated for the course grade.

Hard examsFinal pass ruleQuiz and test heavy
“if you didn't pass the .”
MATH103104
“ ! .”
GEOMETRY

Online

Online students report heavy tests, graphing-heavy finals, and .

Heavy testsGraphing finalsFinal outweighs homework
“if u get all A & but u fail the ”
MATH103104
“ ”
MATH103104

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Save yourself and look for another professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 37 reviews (6 online, 31 in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Recommendation Reality

15/100

“ unless its your last resort.”

⚡ Pace and Clarity

22/100

“She moves so fast it's hard to remember info, we did 3-4 chapters a day, speed run.”

📕

18/100

“She ONLY wants you to do the equations HER way or she will mark you wrong”

📓 Binder and Rules

20/100

“very anal about notebook, organization, being on time to class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Goes super fast when teaching
  • Confusing and always in a rush
  • Students have to correct her answers
  • She can be

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Lots of homework
  • If you didn't pass the

Theme 3

⚠️ About Class Rules

  • Skip class? You won't pass
  • Must keep notebooks her way
  • Binder checks every week

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

37

Recent reviews read by the AI

37

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

37 reviews across many years, including recent online complaints, consistently describe pace, rigidity, and low recommendation.

Inside 37 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 510
1 out of 517

Course coverage

MATH10312 reviews
MATH1047 reviews
MATH1031046 reviews
1033 reviews
MATH1003 reviews
Show 5 more courses
MATH10342 reviews
GEOMETRY1 review
MATH1101 review
MATH1871 review
MATH3041 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 2

B range

4

B 1 · B- 3

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

4

D 4

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1