AI Rate Professor

Literature

Ann Doersch

ENGLT401 · ENGWR · ENGWR50 · ENGRD50 · ENG303 · ENGWRITING300 · ENGLISH301 · ENG50 · ENGLT380 · ENGED305 · ENGLT303 · ENGWR108 · ENGWR101 · ENGWR302 · ENWR51 · ENGL401 · ENGWR480 · ENGWR301 · ENG300 · ENGRW51 · ENGWR59 · ENGWR300 · 73 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
76.92%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you want to improve as a writer and will revise hard; if you need an easy A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough graderClear feedbackCaringSo many papersGet ready to read
  • Most students find her helpful and organized, but .
  • , and revision rather than coasting.
  • Experience varies a lot by course level, with some easy literature sections and some brutal writing sections.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

Some courses feel like an easy A, but , and rewrite frustration keep a true A from being free.

Online literature sometimes looks easy; online and in-person writing courses more .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Average difficulty is moderate, with heavy reading and .

Online writing sections can feel harder and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

Multiple comments say attendance or , and missing classes can get you dropped.

and participation show up in both formats, especially in-person and some online meeting sections.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

because she helps serious writers, even though frustrated students strongly warn others off.

Online reviews are more polarized; in-person reviews are mixed but include many long-term fans.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

42/100

and rewrite chances, yet many students still experience tough or .

Format shift

Online writing courses generate the ; some literature and lower-level classes feel fairer.

Workload

Moderate

46/100

Expect , and ; volume is real but usually manageable if you stay current.

Format shift

Online upper-division writing feels heaviest; .

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Many , and real writing growth, while a sizable minority find her unclear or unhelpful.

Format shift

Recent online praise and older in-person complaints both matter; quality is good overall but not uniform.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Papers, reading responses, discussions, and participation drive grades far more than traditional exams.

Format shift

Both formats are essay- and discussion-centered; a .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

40 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and fair if you work, while others cite favorites, vague prompts, and .

Main concern

, and high expectations can sink students who need more structure.

What students said

“She teaches as if you're still a kid (in a good way) because she really puts in .”
ENGWR101
“I've learned nothing in her class this semester.”
ENGWR101
“I would advise not taking this class.”
ENGWR480

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online and tough, slow, paper-heavy writing courses with .

Main concern

Some students say she approves drafts then still awards D or F grades, and .

What students said

“I LOVE Ms. Doersch! 5 essays. All easy!”
ENGWR108
“I turn in after she revised it and said it was good!”
ENGWR301
“This class was an easy A.”
ENGL401

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly essays and discussion work, with occasional in-class writing finals and high participation weight.

Essay-heavy assessmentIn-class writing finalsParticipation pointsClear criteria when present

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and sometimes in-class finals or prompts, with participation counting heavily.

In-class writing finalsDiscussion participationEssay revisions
“The lectures were basically on the 3 in .”
ENGWR101
“If you want an A, . She doesn't grade participation points fairly (50% of your grade)”
ENGWR300

Online

Online courses emphasize essays, weekly homework, discussion boards, and .

Many essaysDiscussion boardsReading and films
“By far the hardest professor I have ever had.”
ENGWR301
“You watch movies, documentaries, and read a variation of articles and other literature.”
ENGL401

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is a but is willing to help you if you put forth the effort.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting the . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“If you're not good at writing and also aren't a fast learner, I highly suggest this professor!”

👍 Recommendation Rate

74/100

“ !”

⚖️

42/100

“ and .”

📚 Workload Reality

46/100

“Stay on top of the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and
  • She teaches as if you're still a kid (in a good way)
  • She's a really nice professor and very passionate about what she teaches.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This class was an easy A.
  • By far the hardest professor I have ever had.
  • she is a .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • super helpful and understanding
  • She really cares about her students
  • gave me condolences when my father was due to pass away

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

73

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years and courses give a rich, mixed, highly consistent picture of .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 541
4 out of 511
3 out of 510
2 out of 54
1 out of 57

Course coverage

ENGWR3009 reviews
ENGWR507 reviews
ENGWR3015 reviews
ENGL4013 reviews
ENGLT3033 reviews
Show 17 more courses
ENGWR1013 reviews
ENGLT4012 reviews
ENGWR4802 reviews
ENGWR592 reviews
ENWR512 reviews
ENG3001 review
ENG3031 review
ENG501 review
ENGED3051 review
ENGLISH3011 review
ENGLT3801 review
ENGRD501 review
ENGRW511 review
ENGWR1 review
ENGWR1081 review
ENGWR3021 review
ENGWRITING3001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 3 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

3

C 3

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values