AI Rate Professor

English

Jody Van Dusen

ENGWR301 · ENGWR101 · ENGWR302 · ENGWR300 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
85.71%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want to grow as a writer and can keep up with readings, drafts, and feedback.

Best fit · Effort For RewardDetailed essay feedbackTough but fair graderHeavy reading loadEngaging discussionsMultiple drafts
  • and caring presence make writing improvement very real
  • Workload is essay- and , and discussion boards
  • An A is possible but often needs precise following of her draft comments

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

As are , but and weekly drafts mean an A is not automatic.

Online students who revise carefully report fine grades; one intensive in-person summer course felt like hard work for an A+.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is interesting writing and texts and regular essays.

and reading; summer in-person ENGWR301 was described as especially intense.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as important, though one review said attendance was not mandatory.

Online notes show-up and participation; in-person often marks attendance mandatory with participation grades.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and growth, with one clear no due to summer workload intensity.

Online reviews are strongly positive; overloading summer.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Often labeled a tough grader who rewards exact draft revisions and .

Format shift

Tough-grader tags appear online and in person; .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Multiple essay drafts, weekly readings, discussion boards, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Online still has multiple drafts; .

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Students praise clear explanations, charm, availability, and .

Format shift

Online highlights genuine interaction and feedback; in-person highlights personality and clarity.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment centers on essays, drafts, discussion boards, readings, and .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize papers and feedback; online also stresses quizzes and discussion posts.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and and reading; one summer student found weekly drafts too intense.

Main concern

and constant drafts or .

What students said

“Draft or .”
ENGWR301
“It can be a work load but if you keep up with the .”
ENGWR302
“Lots of and quizzes everyday.”
ENGWR101

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students , and solid outcomes if you read and revise.

Main concern

Still expects show-up energy, quizzes, and .

What students said

“There are a few essays but she has you do multiple drafts of each and you are given lots of feedback”
ENGWR302
“If you so up, read, study for the quizzes and .”
ENGWR302

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly papers and quizzes; reviews do .

Essay finalsQuizzesPop quizzesDiscussion boards

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

- and reading-heavy with homework, quizzes, and as the final; pop quizzes are mentioned.

Three essays with final draft as finalPop quizzesNightly homework and readings
“There were only 3 essays; the .”
ENGWR300
“Beware of pop quizzes”
ENGWR302

Online

Online evidence points to quizzes plus multi-draft essays with .

QuizzesMultiple essay draftsDiscussion posts
“study for the quizzes and .”
ENGWR302
“There are a few essays but she has you do multiple drafts of each”
ENGWR302

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She grades fairly and comes across as very genuine even through an online class which isn't easy to do. 10/10 would take again!”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting feedback, writing workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“ so and is always willing to help you out.”

📝

90/100

“ ”

📚 Workload Reality

32/100

“Draft or .”

👍 Recommendation

78/100

“I would love to have her again for a more advanced class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • her personality is absolutely charming
  • She offers lots of and
  • doesnt facilitate any discussion about them which makeS it hard to write on them

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • to get an A.
  • Its not easy to get an A but will learn more.
  • very passable as long as you try

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Lots of and quizzes everyday.
  • So many papers
  • It can be a work load but if you keep up with the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Eight fairly detailed and workload but form a modest sample with limited time span.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGWR3023 reviews
ENGWR1012 reviews
ENGWR3002 reviews
ENGWR3011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1