Jacinth Thomas-Val

ENGWR310 · ENGLCOMP · ENGWR50 · ENG303 · ENG50 · ENGWR51 · ENGWR300 · ENGED305 · ENGWR57 · ENGLT303 · ENGWR302 · ENG302 · ENGLT311 · ENGWR303 · ENGLT331 · ENGLT321 · ENGWR40 · ENG51 · ENGWR301 · ENG300 · ENG331 · ENGWR59 · 87 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 18/100
RMP rating: 2.1/5
Take again: 19.23%
Difficulty: 3.9

The decision

Avoid unless you have no other option and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderUnorganized teachingHarsh on essaysConfusing feedbackAvoid for writing

Most students report and weak essay instruction.
Many describe rudeness, disorganization, and .
A if you communicate constantly, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

22/100

Even strong writers report Ds and harsh essay scores; high grades require perfectionism and luck.

Both online and ; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Heavy papers, pop quizzes, and typical GE writing.

Difficulty high in both formats.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and you will not pass; strict on absences.

; online still unforgiving on missed work.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Would-take-again is about 19% with a large majority urging students to pick anyone else.

Negative recommendation dominates both online and in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

, and grades that feel arbitrary.

Format shift

and in person.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

, and graded-by-few high-stakes items.

Format shift

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Frequent complaints of off-topic lectures, confusion, and failure to teach writing clearly.

Format shift

Online feels self-taught; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Essays and most courses.

Format shift

Online adds timed essays/quizzes; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

39 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews dominate with complaints of , and disorganization.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“do yourself a favor and . literally the ”
ENGWR300

“ .”
ENGWR300

“The most rigorous class I've ever taken. So many papers and a .”
ENGWR302

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report , and hard grading with little flexibility.

Main concern

; missing one assignment can tank the grade.

What students said

“This class was rough... the and you don't get a lot of flexibility.”
ENGWR300

“Had no class zoom meetings. Self-taught.”
ENGWR300

“Lots of work and !”
ENGLT303

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

High-stakes papers and pop or .

Pop quizzesTimed essaysPaper-heavy gradingFew graded items

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews stress essay-heavy courses, pop quizzes, and .

Essay heavyPop quizzesNo clear rubricStrict attendance

“ .”
ENGWR300

“So many papers and a .”
ENGWR302

Online

Online reviews mention timed essays treated as quizzes, discussion posts, and .

Timed essay quizDiscussion postsFew high-stakes grades

“considered a and grade.”
ENGWR300

“miss anything and your grade will suffer”
ENGWR301

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“do yourself a favor and . literally the ”
Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (11 online, 39 in and . Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Recommendation

18/100

“ .”

⚖️

18/100

“Dont be surprise if you get a D after all the hard work and .”

📉 Teaching Clarity

24/100

“ and doesn't help at all.”

📝 Paper Load

24/100

“Lots of work and !”

Theme 1

📝

Grades mostly format and grammar

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

Goes off subject
Unorganized

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

Very rude
Highly opinionated

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews over a decade with and teaching clarity.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512

4 out of 57

3 out of 510

2 out of 516

1 out of 542

Course coverage

ENGWR3007 reviews

ENGWR517 reviews

ENGWR3015 reviews

ENG503 reviews

ENGLT3113 reviews

Show 18 more courses

ENGWR3023 reviews

ENGWR503 reviews

ENG3002 reviews

ENGLT3032 reviews

ENGWR3032 reviews

3011 review

ENG3021 review

ENG3031 review

ENG3311 review

ENG511 review

ENGED3051 review

ENGLCOMP1 review

ENGLT3211 review

ENGLT3311 review

ENGWR3101 review

ENGWR401 review

ENGWR571 review

ENGWR591 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

A+ 2 · A 3

B range

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

D+ 2 · D 1 · D- 1

F

F 1

No letter grade reported

Incomplete 2 · Not sure yet 1

Jacinth Thomas-Val

Avoid unless you have no other option and x x x x x x.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

HardWork

Challenging

Mandatory

Avoid

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

🚫 Recommendation

⚖️ x x

📉 Teaching Clarity

📝 Paper Load

📝 x x x x

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

Avoid unless you have no other option and .

⚖️

📝