AI Rate Professor

Math & Statisitics

Hsiao Wang

MATH335 · MATH400 · MATH103 · MATH123 · MATH34 · MATH120HYBRID · MATH120 · MATH370 · MATH401 · MATH100 · MATH104 · MATH373 · 138 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
44.44%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you already study math independently; otherwise pick another professor.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-Taught RequiredLots of HomeworkTest HeavyConfusing LecturesFair Partial Credit
  • Many students say lectures are fast, erratic, or and end up learning from ALEKS, YouTube, or the book.
  • but , and several students call her grading fair with partial credit.
  • as mandatory; skipping makes passing much harder.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A usually requires doing heavy homework, redoing problems, and self-study because tests are difficult and is rare.

Both online and ; online students rely heavily on ALEKS.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Courses span trig through calc with fast pacing, abstract topics, and .

Difficulty is consistently high across formats; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and tags warn that skipping class means you will not pass.

In-person evidence dominates; online also implies lectures matter even if students stop attending.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

; supporters like fair grading, critics urge avoiding her if .

Recommendation is mixed in person; online is split between one strong yes and one strong no.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Several students praise fair grading and partial credit, while others call her a .

Format shift

Online comments call grading fair; and tough curves.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Weekly loads of homework, quizzes, and homework.

Format shift

; in-person weekly problem sets are equally demanding.

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

Students agree she knows math but many find lectures incoherent, rushed, and unhelpful for questions.

Format shift

Online and complaints in person.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Grade weight centers on quizzes and .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize test-heavy structure with and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

47 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and homework-aligned quizzes, while many report , irritability about questions, and a need to self-teach.

Main concern

Lecture quality and classroom attitude .

What students said

“Knows her stuff but her teaching skills are laughably terrible.”
MATH373
“For .”
MATH335
“Before her class my GPA was 4.0. but got C+.”
MATH100

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online ; one student loved her prep for later math, others found lectures a waste and learned from ALEKS and the text.

Main concern

Weak lecture delivery forces students to teach themselves online.

What students said

“I can say that she prepares you for your next math class.”
MATH401
“I learned everything from the ALEKS hw (lots of it!) and the textbook.”
MATH373

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and exams are generally described as fair but difficult, with occasional curveballs.

Homework-based quizzesFair testsStudy guidesPartial creditPop quizzes sometimes

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and often hard; study guides help some, while others report material not covered in lecture.

Test heavyStudy guidesDifficult testsPartial credit
“ graded on BUT SHE DOES NOT GO THRU 80% OF AND QUIZZES.”
MATH335
“ question wrong but the ideas right and get a C.”
MATH400

Online

and tests are fair, with heavy ALEKS practice.

Easy quizzes from homeworkFair tests
“ . .”
MATH401
“ and but be prepared to teach yourself.”
MATH373

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Simply put, if theres another option, do .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews spanning 2013-2021, highlighting self-study needs, homework load, and . Credibility rating: High.

📚 Self-Teaching Required

40/100

“I learned everything from aleks system or the tutors in math lab. Her lectures are a complete waste of time.”

📝

28/100

“She gave out a big load of hw each week, and I mostly used YouTube or the book to learn.”

⚖️

55/100

“She grades EXTREMELY fairly too, in fact I prefer her grading over the other professors at SCC.”

👎 Split Recommendation

42/100

“if theres another option, do .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lessons are incoherent.
  • She works out the problems too quickly and .
  • She gets irritated if you ask to many questions.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • . .
  • .
  • ! .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support and Attitude

  • She was pretty rude to people who asked questions in class.
  • She's a nice, intelligent professor that .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

138

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over many years with detailed, , and grading support high credibility.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 532
4 out of 523
3 out of 515
2 out of 532
1 out of 536

Course coverage

MATH33511 reviews
MATH40111 reviews
MATH1007 reviews
MATH1206 reviews
MATH3735 reviews
Show 7 more courses
MATH4004 reviews
MATH1031 review
MATH1041 review
MATH120HYBRID1 review
MATH1231 review
MATH341 review
MATH3701 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

29 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 6

B range

6

B+ 3 · B 1 · B- 2

C range

3

C+ 2 · C 1

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

11

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 2 · Not sure yet 7