AI Rate Professor

Languages & Literature

Janis Haag

ENGMEDI · ENGCW450 · JOUR302 · ENGCW400 · JOUR300 · JOUR310 · ENGWR302 · JOURNALISM310 · CW400 · JOUR410 · COMM351 · ENGWR380 · JOURN302 · JOUR320 · ENGWR301 · ENG300 · ENGL420 · ENGCW433 · ENGWR300 · 42 lifetime ratings

AI rating
95/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Take Jan if you want a and makes class enjoyable.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring and inspirationalEasy A with effortGraded by few thingsSupportive feedbackLecture stories and passion
  • Nearly universal praise for warmth, passion, and
  • Most students call classes easy As if you do the work and attend
  • Some courses require interviews, journals, or

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Many students say easy A, graded by few things, and second-chance rewrites if you put in work.

Online reviews shout Easy A; policies.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Content is approachable and story-driven, though AP tests, interviews, and journals add some load.

Online feels lighter; in-person difficulty clusters around 1-3 with occasional harder notes.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

32/100

and participation are mandatory, sometimes with low absence limits.

Online notes optional or not stated; .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

93/100

Overwhelming love across decades, 100 percent take-again when reported, with only rare outliers.

; in-person volume is the main evidence base.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

Students call her an easy or and often allows rewrites or .

Format shift

Online emphasizes easy grading; and AP retests.

Workload

Light

68/100

, though journals and interviews can pile up in writing courses.

Format shift

Online workload is lighter quizzes and essays; and interviews.

Teaching experience

Excellent

91/100

Students repeatedly call her amazing, witty, passionate, and the .

Format shift

Praise is consistent online and in person, with .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

38/100

, and occasional AP-style tests rather than pure finals.

Format shift

Online centers quizzes and movie essays; , and AP tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

40 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Long-running in-person reputation as a , and creative writing.

Main concern

Some classes require interviews, many journals, or and .

What students said

“I loved this class! Its one of my favorites I have taken at city!”
JOUR320
“ . I dreaded English my entire life!”
ENGWR301
“Jan is so caring and overall a great teacher. .”
COMM351

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online sections are straightforward Easy As with , and a caring tone.

Main concern

and occasional essays.

What students said

“Gives power point presentations and a few videos to watch and take notes on and . watch, with multiple movie choices given. Easy A.”
JOUR310
“Easy A. Just do the work & you'll pass. There are many opportunities.”
JOUR320

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments often allow multiple AP attempts, rewrites, or open materials, with .

Open book open note (some courses)AP style test with 3 attemptsQuizzes from lecturesRewrite opportunities

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

74/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person ranges from open-book and lecture-based written quizzes.

Open book open noteThree chances on AP style testLecture-based written quizzes
“ ”
COMM351
“You need to pass a certain test, and Jan gives you three chances and !”
JOUR302

Online

Online work is mainly notes-based quizzes and occasional movie essays; no strict proctoring described.

Quiz after videos and slidesMovie-based essays
“ and a few videos to watch and take notes on and .”
JOUR310

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's so understanding. ; any class with her will be a joy.”

Voice snapshots generated from 42 reviews (2 online, 40 in-person), highlighting care, ease, and teaching passion. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

91/100

“Jan is amazing. She is the .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

93/100

“ .”

💚 Caring Support

90/100

“She is passionate, knows the subject, and truly wants to see each student succeed.”

📈 Easy A Path

84/100

“very easy a. volunteering and interviewing may be a pain, but .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • quick witted and definitely knows and loves what she's teaching
  • amazing lectures
  • gives criticism gently but firmly

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A. Just do the work & you'll pass
  • As long as second chance to improve the grade

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She's so sweet
  • JAN HAAG IS AMAZING!!
  • She truly is AMAZING

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

42

Recent reviews read by the AI

42

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

42 reviews spanning roughly 2006-2021 with rich detail and strong consistency, despite a few older negative outliers.

Inside 42 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 535
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

JOUR3027 reviews
ENGCW4006 reviews
ENGWR3006 reviews
JOUR3103 reviews
JOUR3203 reviews
Show 14 more courses
COMM3512 reviews
ENGWR3012 reviews
ENGWR3022 reviews
CW4001 review
ENG3001 review
ENGCW4331 review
ENGCW4501 review
ENGL4201 review
ENGMEDI1 review
ENGWR3801 review
JOUR3001 review
JOUR4101 review
JOURN3021 review
JOURNALISM3101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 5 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1