AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Autumn Cahoon

ANTH300301 · ANTHLAB · ANTH301 · ANTH300 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid unless and are ready to teach yourself the material.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHarsh GraderUnapproachableHard TestsMisses ClassSubjective Grading
  • Most students call her rude, sarcastic, and unhelpful in office or class.
  • Quizzes and tests often cover tiny details not clearly taught; and subjective.
  • She frequently misses class and lectures feel rushed; only a few older reviews are positive.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

and when notes or notecards are allowed.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Students say quizzes and and feel much harder than a standard anthro course should be.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

At least one review states attendance was mandatory and .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Would-take-again is 0% and most comments urge others to stay away.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students repeatedly report harsh, subjective grading on writing and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

40/100

A one-unit class felt like three units; weekly writing and hard quizzes add real workload.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Common themes are rushed lectures, temper issues, sarcasm, and frequent absences.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Grades hinge heavily on tough quizzes and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

as difficult, harsh, and often absent, with only one strong older positive review.

Main concern

, and unapproachable demeanor.

What students said

“ . .”
ANTH300301
“ about the class.”
ANTH300
“Overall it was a great learning experience.”
ANTH301

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Notecards or a notes page are often allowed, but quizzes and as hard and poorly aligned with the book.

Notecards AllowedHard QuizzesDetail-Heavy Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

yet remain tough, with questions often off textbook or lecture.

Notecards AllowedHard QuizzesDetail-Heavy Tests
“She allows 3x4 notecards but the textbooks or the lectures.”
ANTH300301
“She allows you to use a full front and back page of notes, but the as well as the .”
ANTH301

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . . She makes this class so much harder than it should even be.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 in-person reviews spanning 2007-2021, highlighting harsh grading and poor teaching. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

28/100

“ about the class.”

🚫 Recommendation

18/100

“ ”

⚖️

22/100

“Grades harshly, for no reason.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She will throw a temper tantrum during her lectures.
  • Not a coherent lecture. Missed many classes.
  • Her lectures seemed like she was always in a rush to finish.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The .
  • and very broad, no study guides given.
  • This one unit class was a lot of work.

Theme 3

😠 About Approachability

  • You can't ask her a question without getting a weird face or sarcastic comment.
  • Extremely rude and lazy.
  • STAY AWAY!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews span 2007-2021 with consistent negative themes, but sample is small and many grades are missing.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 55
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ANTH3003 reviews
ANTH3013 reviews
ANTH3003012 reviews
ANTHLAB1 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values