AI Rate Professor

Graphic Communication

Stephen Studyvin

ANIM303 · ANIMATION1 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

Avoid Stephen if .

Best fit · Self Taught ProSlow responsesTough graderModule locksArrogant toneAvoid if possible
  • Both reviews give quality 1 and .
  • Students dislike locked online modules and forced multi-login workflows.
  • He is described as slow, hard to please, and dismissive in replies.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Tagged as a and hard to please, with no evidence of As.

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

Difficulty ratings are high and students stress friction from locks, expectations, and slow help.

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

; another marks attendance mandatory.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

and both students call the experience among the .

All recommendation evidence is online.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students say he is a and very hard to please.

Format shift

Online-only evidence.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Complaints center on course design and .

Format shift

Online-only evidence.

Teaching experience

Awful

14/100

Reviews describe dodgy methods, slow arrogant responses, and the .

Format shift

Online-only evidence.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly detail exam versus assignment weights beyond general course modules.

Format shift

Online-only evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report frustrating , and a .

Main concern

Poor communication and annoying course locks that force frequent logins.

What students said

“His methods are dodgy. While in . He set these weird locks on the modules that are annoying and required us to log in many times a week.”
ANIMATION1
“He and then when he does reply its arrogant. He is very hard to please.”
ANIM303

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove webcam, open-book, or .

Module locksLimited exam detail

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

; complaints focus on locked modules and frequent required logins.

Locked modulesFrequent required logins
“He set these weird locks on the modules that are annoying and required us to log in many times a week.”
ANIMATION1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I feel he has been the and Digital Media at Sacramento City College.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 online reviews with consistently negative teaching and design complaints. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫 Recommendation Crash

5/100

“Hopefully, if on who you get as a professor. I did not have that luxury.”

🐢 Communication Issues

18/100

“He and then when he does reply its arrogant.”

🔒 Course Design Friction

30/100

“He set these weird locks on the modules that are annoying and required us to log in many times a week.”

Theme 1

💻 About Online Course Design

  • methods are dodgy
  • weird locks on the modules
  • required us to log in many times a week

Theme 2

💬 About Instructor Tone

  • very hard to please
  • and Digital Media

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two recent online reviews exist, both extremely negative, so confidence is limited by sample size.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ANIM3031 review
ANIMATION11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values